Health Education Research Advance Access published online on July 7, 2006
Health Education Research, doi:10.1093/her/cyl051
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Center of Excellence in Cancer Communications Research, 1136 WARF Building, 610 Walnut Street, Madison, WI 53726, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. To provide insights about how women with breast cancer learn from interactive cancer communication systems (ICCSs), this study examined how use of different types of services that employ conceptually distinct pedagogical methods relates to learning outcomes. The study sample included 231 recently diagnosed, lower income breast cancer patients. Participants were provided a free computer, Internet access and training in how to use an ICCS called the Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System Living with Breast Cancer program. Data comprised survey information collected at pre-test and 4 months after using the system and computer records of how women used the system (use data). The findings suggest that use of the information and interactive services independently contributed to perceived information competence, though the communication services, including both discussion group and ask an expert, did not. Consistent with expectations, use of discussion group and interactive services amplified the learning effects of using the information services. However, use of the ask an expert service did not amplify the learning effects of using the information services as predicted. Some constructivist pedagogical methods--specifically online support groups and intelligently designed, computer-driven interactive services--may supplement and extend the learning potential of information services delivered via a transmission-oriented pedagogical approach.
Received October 24, 2005
Accepted May 22, 2006
Original article
How women with breast cancer learn using interactive cancer communication systems
Bret R. Shaw 1 *,
Jeong Yeob Han 1,
Timothy Baker 2,
Jeffre Witherly 3,
Robert P. Hawkins 1,
Fiona McTavish 1,
and
David H. Gustafson 1
2 Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1136 WARF Building, 610 Walnut Street, Madison, WI 53726, USA
3 Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Building 45, Room 3As.49H 45 Center Drive, MSC 6200 Bethesda, MD 20892-6200, USA
Bret R. Shaw, E-mail: bretshaw{at}chsra.wisc.edu
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Frost and M. Massagli PatientsLikeMe the case for a data-centered patient community and how ALS patients use the community to inform treatment decisions and manage pulmonary health Chronic Respiratory Disease, November 1, 2009; 6(4): 225 - 229. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Bickell, J. Weidmann, K. Fei, J. J. Lin, and H. Leventhal Underuse of Breast Cancer Adjuvant Treatment: Patient Knowledge, Beliefs, and Medical Mistrust J. Clin. Oncol., November 1, 2009; 27(31): 5160 - 5167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. L. DuBenske, M.-Y. Chih, S. Dinauer, D. H. Gustafson, and J. F. Cleary Development and Implementation of a Clinician Reporting System for Advanced Stage Cancer: Initial Lessons Learned J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., September 1, 2008; 15(5): 679 - 686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


