Skip Navigation



Health Education Research Advance Access published online on June 8, 2006
Health Education Research, doi:10.1093/her/cyl045
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/1/49    most recent
cyl045v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Webb, O. J.
Right arrow Articles by Eves, F. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Webb, O. J.
Right arrow Articles by Eves, F. F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received August 29, 2005
Accepted April 18, 2006

Original article

Promoting stair climbing: effects of message specificity and validation

Oliver J. Webb 1 * and Frank F. Eves 1

1 The School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Oliver J. Webb, E-mail: OXW844{at}Bham.ac.uk


  Abstract

Current exercise guidelines encourage the daily accumulation of lifestyle activities, such as stair climbing. Although several studies show that visual prompts can increase stair usage, there has been little systematic assessment of the messages employed. Some of the messages used in previous interventions represent general descriptions of stair climbing (e.g. ‘free exercise’), while others emphasize specific consequences of stair use (e.g. ‘keeps you fit’). Twelve hundred structured interviews were conducted in order to establish which type of message is more persuasive. In addition, half of the interviewees were told that the messages were true, in order to assess how validating messages may influence their persuasive appeal. Results suggest that messages focussing on specific consequences are more persuasive than those providing general descriptions and that validating the information presented in stair-climbing interventions may increase their efficacy. Previous messages may not, therefore, have demonstrated the full potential of stair climbing as a model for increasing population activity levels.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.