Skip Navigation



Health Education Research Advance Access published online on September 22, 2004
Health Education Research, doi:10.1093/her/cyg121
© 2004 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/2/206    most recent
cyg121v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cross, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cross, R. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Received April 28, 2004
Accepted July 24, 2004

Original article

Exploring attitudes: the case for Q methodology

R. M. Cross 1*

1 Leeds Metropolitan University, Queen Square House, Leeds LS1 3HE, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: r.m.cross{at}leedsmet.ac.uk.


  Abstract

Attitudes are often referred to, researched and considered in the discipline of health education and health promotion. This paper highlights Q methodology as an appropriate and relevant means of exploring and studying attitudes within this field. It begins by discussing the difficulties in defining attitude and the problems inherent in attitude measurement. A brief history of Q methodology is given, followed by an explanation of what Q methodology is and the processes involved. This paper argues the case for the use of Q methodology when studying attitudes and justifies why Q methodology should particularly be selected in the study of attitudes within the health field. There are many reasons for this assertion which are explored throughout the paper. The principle one is that Q methodology is a more robust technique, than alternative methods, for the measurement of attitudes and subjective opinion. This paper concludes by proposing that Q methodology is taken up by researchers within health education and health promotion who are concerned with exploring attitudes and subjective opinion.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 West J Nurs ResHome page
N. Akhtar-Danesh, A. Baumann, and L. Cordingley
Q-Methodology in Nursing Research: A Promising Method for the Study of Subjectivity
West J Nurs Res, October 1, 2008; 30(6): 759 - 773.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 jvmeHome page
G. de Graaf
Veterinary Students' Views on Animal Patients and Human Clients, Using Q-Methodology
J Vet Med Educ, January 1, 2007; 34(2): 127 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.