Skip Navigation



Health Education Research Advance Access published online on June 15, 2004
Health Education Research, doi:10.1093/her/cyg097
© 2004 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/1/101    most recent
cyg097v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow E-letters: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Charlton, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Charlton, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Received January 12, 2004
Accepted April 12, 2004

Original article

Tobacco or health 1602: an Elizabethan doctor speaks

Anne Charlton 1*

1 Emeritus Professor of Cancer Health Education, School of Epidemiology and Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Manchester M13 9PT, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Anne.Charlton{at}man.ac.uk.


  Abstract

A few years before the death of Queen Elizabeth I, a booklet entitled Work for Chimny-Sweepers or A Warning for Tabacconists [sic], was published. Written by a doctor who called himself Philaretes, it was the first publication to present the health risks of tobacco use. Using continuum content analysis, which follows each of Philaretes's main messages over the subsequent four centuries, this paper sets his publication in the historical context of the medical and social frame of reference in which it was produced, and charts the development of each theme in later scientific research. In the setting of contemporary Tudor medical theory, based on ‘the humours’, Philaretes discussed many of the health risks that later research has proven to be true. In common with many early attempts at health education, the principles of Philaretes's approach appear to be what were later to be called the Health Belief Model and the KAP formula. By providing information about serious personal health risks and, thus, increasing the readers' knowledge, he hoped to change their attitude and consequently their behaviour. Overshadowed by King James I's much less scientific Counterblaste to Tobacco, Philaretes's publication deserves more credit than it has been given.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Health Educ ResHome page
A. Charlton
An example of health education in the early 17th century: Naturall and artificial Directions for Health by William Vaughan
Health Educ. Res., December 1, 2005; 20(6): 656 - 664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 AJPHHome page
T. R. Frieden and D. E. Blakeman
The Dirty Dozen: 12 Myths That Undermine Tobacco Control
Am J Public Health, September 1, 2005; 95(9): 1500 - 1505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

E-letters:

Read all E-letters

Tobacco or Health 1602: A Reply to Charlton
Michael Melczak
Health Education Research, 10 Jan 2006 [Full text]

Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.