Skip Navigation



Health Education Research Advance Access published online on May 20, 2004

Health Education Research, doi:10.1093/her/cyg059
© 2004 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/5/485    most recent
cyg059v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gill, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Donaghy, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gill, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Donaghy, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Received September 8, 2002
Accepted September 11, 2003

Original article

Variation in the alcohol content of a ‘drink’ of wine and spirit poured by a sample of the Scottish population

Jan S. Gill 1* Marie Donaghy 1

1 School of Health Sciences, Queen Margaret University College, Leith, Edinburgh EH6 8HX, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jgill{at}qmuc.ac.uk.


   Abstract

The standard UK alcohol unit is used to record alcohol consumption and, in health promotion, as a useful yardstick by which the public may be encouraged to monitor their own drinking levels. To investigate the correspondence between this standard unit and the actual amount contained in the ‘usual’ drink poured by a sample of the Scottish public, participants (n = 251) were recruited from three employers in a major city-a manufacturer, an academic and a financial institution. Following a brief questionnaire, participants were asked to pour their usual drink of wine, and then spirit, into a glass. Among drinkers (n = 238), the mean amount of alcohol in a drink of wine corresponded to not 1, but 1.92 UK units. For spirit, the corresponding figure was 2.3 UK units. For wine, 43% of the sample poured more than 2 units, for spirit, 55%. (Males poured significantly more spirit than females.) These findings may have important implications for individuals who wish to promote and to adopt sensible drinking practices when consuming wine and spirit at home. Also, the reliability of many consumption surveys, where there is often the implicit assumption that a ‘drink’ is equivalent to a ‘standard unit’, must be questioned.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Public Health (Oxf)Home page
G. D. Batty, H. Lewars, C. Emslie, C. R. Gale, and K. Hunt
Internationally recognized guidelines for 'sensible' alcohol consumption: is exceeding them actually detrimental to health and social circumstances? Evidence from a population-based cohort study
J. Public Health Med., September 1, 2009; 31(3): 360 - 365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stat Methods Med ResHome page
W. L Wrieden and A. S Anderson
Measurement of food and alcohol intake in relation to chronic liver disease
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, June 1, 2009; 18(3): 285 - 301.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Alcohol AlcoholHome page
J. Gill and F. O'May
Practical demonstration of personal daily consumption limits: a useful intervention tool to promote responsible drinking among UK adults?
Alcohol Alcohol., September 1, 2007; 42(5): 436 - 441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
J. S. Gill, M. Donaghy, J. Guise, and P. Warner
Descriptors and accounts of alcohol consumption: methodological issues piloted with female undergraduate drinkers in Scotland
Health Educ. Res., February 1, 2007; 22(1): 27 - 36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.