Skip Navigation



Health Education Research Advance Access published online on May 20, 2004
Health Education Research, doi:10.1093/her/cyg046
© 2004 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/4/440    most recent
cyg046v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Charnock, D.
Right arrow Articles by Shepperd, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Charnock, D.
Right arrow Articles by Shepperd, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Received April 1, 2003
Accepted June 27, 2003

Original article

Learning to DISCERN online: applying an appraisal tool to health websites in a workshop setting

Deborah Charnock 1* Sasha Shepperd 2

1 The Kendra Consortium, Creighton House, Sandwich CT13 9HN, UK
2 Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Centre for Professional Development, Department of Continuing Education, Oxford OX1 1PT, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: deborah.charnock{at}lineone.net.


  Abstract

This study examined the application of DISCERN--validated criteria for judging the quality of printed information on treatment--to online health information in a workshop setting. A survey was conducted amongst 57 participants attending DISCERN Online workshops. Participants were health information users--health care and information providers, consumers (patients/carers), and consumer representatives. Workshops involved using DISCERN to appraise a health website. Participants completed questionnaires before and after the workshop, and at 2 months follow-up. Responses revealed that participants accessed online health information for professional (85.7%) and personal (75%) reasons. Less than half (41%) had applied some form of quality criteria to online information prior to attending the workshop. Despite varying levels of expertise, participants found DISCERN and the supporting materials accessible. The majority (96.2%) agreed DISCERN would help users discriminate between high- and low-quality online treatment information, and would be applicable to a wide variety of such information. At follow-up, most (89.6%) reported that their attitude to consumer health information of all types had changed--mostly becoming more critical or systematic. It is possible that general schemes such as DISCERN will provide users with simple and flexible skills for dealing with the wide range of treatment information available.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
G Akram, A H Thomson, A C Boyter, and M J S Morton
Characterisation and evaluation of UK websites on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
Arch. Dis. Child., August 1, 2008; 93(8): 695 - 700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Health Educ ResHome page
T. P. Lintonen, A. I. Konu, and D. Seedhouse
Information technology in health promotion
Health Educ. Res., June 1, 2008; 23(3): 560 - 566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Librarianship and Information ScienceHome page
L. A. Marshall and D. Williams
Health information: does quality count for the consumer?: How consumers evaluate the quality of health information materials across a variety of media
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, September 1, 2006; 38(3): 141 - 156.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.