Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Francisco, V. T.
Right arrow Articles by Fawcett, S. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Francisco, V. T.
Right arrow Articles by Fawcett, S. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Education Research, Vol. 8, No. 3, 403-416, 1993
© 1993 Oxford University Press


research-article

A methodology for monitoring and evaluating community health coalitions

Vincent T. Francisco, Adrienne L. Paine and Stephen B. Fawcett

Department of Human Development, University of Kansas Lawrence, KS 66045, USA

Community coalitions are prominent mechanisms for building local capacities to address health and social concerns. Although there are case studies and descriptive reports on coalitions, there is little empirical information about coalition process and outcome. This paper describes a case study using a methodology for monitoring and evaluating community health coalitions. Data are fed back to coalition leaders and members, funding agents, and other relevant audiences as part of the development process. The monitoring system provides data on eight key measures of coalition process and outcome: the number of members, planning products, financial resources generated, dollars obtained, volunteers recruited, services provided, community actions and community changes. Illustrative data are presented for two different community health coalitions. Finally, challenges and opportunities in evaluating community coalitions are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
M. C. Kegler, B. L. Norton, and R. Aronson
Achieving organizational change: findings from case studies of 20 California healthy cities and communities coalitions
Health Promot. Int., June 1, 2008; 23(2): 109 - 118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
L. Gold, A. Shiell, P. Hawe, T. Riley, B. Rankin, and P. Smithers
The costs of a community-based intervention to promote maternal health
Health Educ. Res., October 1, 2007; 22(5): 648 - 657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Promot PractHome page
D. Tandon, K. Parillo, C. Jenkins, J. Jenkins, and A. Duggan
Promotion of Service Integration Among Home Visiting Programs and Community Coalitions Working With Low-Income, Pregnant, and Parenting Women
Health Promot Pract, January 1, 2007; 8(1): 79 - 87.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
W. L. Beery, S. Senter, A. Cheadle, H. P. Greenwald, D. Pearson, R. Brousseau, and G. D. Nelson
Evaluating the Legacy of Community Health Initiatives: A Conceptual Framework and Example From the California Wellness Foundation's Health Improvement Initiative
American Journal of Evaluation, June 1, 2005; 26(2): 150 - 165.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Promot PractHome page
G. X. Ma, J. I. Toubbeh, X. Su, and R. L. Edwards
ATECAR: An Asian American Community-Based Participatory Research Model on Tobacco and Cancer Control
Health Promot Pract, October 1, 2004; 5(4): 382 - 394.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
M. L. Granner and P. A. Sharpe
Evaluating community coalition characteristics and functioning: a summary of measurement tools
Health Educ. Res., October 1, 2004; 19(5): 514 - 532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
P. Hawe, A. Shiell, T. Riley, and L. Gold
Methods for exploring implementation variation and local context within a cluster randomised community intervention trial
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, September 1, 2004; 58(9): 788 - 793.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
E. S. Weiss, R. M. Anderson, and R. D. Lasker
Making the Most of Collaboration: Exploring the Relationship Between Partnership Synergy and Partnership Functioning
Health Educ Behav, December 1, 2002; 29(6): 683 - 698.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
B. J. Weiner, J. A. Alexander, and S. M. Shortell
Management and Governance Processes in Community Health Coalitions: A Procedural Justice Perspective
Health Educ Behav, December 1, 2002; 29(6): 737 - 754.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Promot PractHome page
N. Wallerstein, M. Polascek, and K. Maltrud
Participatory Evaluation Model for Coalitions: The Development of Systems Indicators
Health Promot Pract, July 1, 2002; 3(3): 361 - 373.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
A. Paine-Andrews, J. L. Fisher, J. B. Patton, S. B. Fawcett, E. L. Williams, R. K. Lewis, and K. J. Harris
Analyzing the Contribution of Community Change to Population Health Outcomes in an Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention Initiative
Health Educ Behav, April 1, 2002; 29(2): 183 - 193.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
N. J. Chrisman, K. Senturia, G. Tang, and B. Gheisar
Qualitative Process Evaluation of Urban Community Work: A Preliminary View
Health Educ Behav, April 1, 2002; 29(2): 232 - 248.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Promot PractHome page
B. Kahan and M. Goodstadt
The Interactive Domain Model of Best Practices in Health Promotion: Developing and Implementing a Best Practices Approach to Health Promotion
Health Promot Pract, January 1, 2001; 2(1): 43 - 67.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
M. C. Kegler, J. M. Twiss, and V. Look
Assessing Community Change at Multiple Levels: The Genesis of an Evaluation Framework for the California Healthy Cities Project
Health Educ Behav, December 1, 2000; 27(6): 760 - 779.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Promot PractHome page
A. J. Hausman and J. Becker
Using Participatory Research to Plan Evaluation in Violence Prevention
Health Promot Pract, October 1, 2000; 1(4): 331 - 340.
[PDF]


Home page
Health Promot PractHome page
A. Paine-Andrews, J. L. Fisher, M. K. Campuzano, S. B. Fawcett, and J. Berkley-Patton
Promoting Sustainability of Community Health Initiatives: An Empirical Case Study
Health Promot Pract, July 1, 2000; 1(3): 248 - 258.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Promot PractHome page
V. T. Francisco, E. M. Capwell, and F. Butterfoss
Getting off to a Good Start with Your Evaluation
Health Promot Pract, April 1, 2000; 1(2): 126 - 131.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
B. J. Maciak, R. Guzman, A. Santiago, G. Villalobos, and B. A. Israel
Establishing LA VIDA: A Community-Based Partnership to Prevent Intimate Violence against Latina Women
Health Educ Behav, December 1, 1999; 26(6): 821 - 840.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
Practice Notes: Strategies in Health Education
Health Educ Behav, August 1, 1999; 26(4): 438 - 442.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
L. A. Linnan, J. L. Fava, B. Thompson, K. Emmons, K. Basen-Engquist, C. Probart, M. K. Hunt, and J. Heimendinger
Measuring participatory strategies: instrument development for worksite populations
Health Educ. Res., June 1, 1999; 14(3): 371 - 386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
M. C. Kegler, A. Steckler, K. Mcleroy, and S. H. Malek
Factors That Contribute to Effective Community Health Promotion Coalitions: A Study of 10 Project ASSIST Coalitions in North Carolina
Health Educ Behav, June 1, 1998; 25(3): 338 - 353.
[Abstract]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
S. Sussman, C. W. Dent, E. R. Galaif, A. W. Stacy, T. Newman, M. A. Moss, M. Hennesy, S. Craig, M. A. Pentz, and T. R. Simon
Implementation and Process Evaluation of a Student "School-as-Community" Group: A Component of a School-Based Drug Abuse Prevention Program
Eval Rev, February 1, 1997; 21(1): 94 - 123.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.