Health Education Research Advance Access originally published online on August 8, 2005
Health Education Research 2006 21(1):116-132; doi:10.1093/her/cyh048
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The European Smoking prevention Framework Approach (ESFA): effects after 24 and 30 months
1 Department of Health Promotion and Health Education, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands, 2 Health Promotion Service, Institute of Medicine and Health, Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 3 Portuguese Council for Smoking Prevention, Lisbon, Portugal, 4 Department of Epidemiology and Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK, 5 Department of Cancer Prevention and Documentation, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark, 6 STIVORO for a Smoke-free Future, The Hague, The Netherlands, 7 National Public Health Institute, Helsinki, Finland and 8 Department of Statistics, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
9 Correspondence to: H. de Vries; E-mail: hein.devries{at}gvo.unimaas.nl
The European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach (ESFA) study in six countries tested the effects of a comprehensive smoking prevention approach after 24 (T3; N = 10 751) and 30 months (T4; N = 9282). The programme targeted four levels, i.e. adolescents in schools, school policies, parents and the community. In Portugal, 12.4% of the T1 non-smokers in the control group had started smoking at T4 compared to 7.9% of the experimental group. Smoking onset in the experimental group was thus 36% lower. In Finland, 32.4% of the T1 non-smokers started smoking compared to 27.6% of the experimental group, implying a 15% lower onset in the experimental group. In Spain, 33.0% of the T1 non-smokers in the control group had started smoking, compared to 29.1% of the experimental group, implying a 12% lower onset. In The Netherlands, the ESFA programme was effective for non-native adolescents with 11.4% new weekly smokers compared to 19.9% in the control group. An opposite effect was found in native Dutch adolescents with 19.0% new weekly smokers in the comparison group compared to 24.0% new smokers in the experimental group. Future programmes should use more standardized ways to assess process evaluations and should assess which elements are responsible for behavioral effects.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Ariza, M. Nebot, Z. Tomas, E. Gimenez, S. Valmayor, V. Tarilonte, and H. De Vries Longitudinal effects of the European smoking prevention framework approach (ESFA) project in Spanish adolescents Eur J Public Health, June 18, 2008; (2008) ckn050v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
