Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Telford, R.
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Telford, R.
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Education Research, Vol. 18, No. 6, 743-753, December 2003
© 2003 Oxford University Press

What influences elderly peoples’ decisions about whether to accept the influenza vaccination? A qualitative study

Rosie Telford and Anne Rogers1

Robert Darbishire Practice, Rusholme Health Centre, Manchester M14 6NP and 1 School of Primary Care, University of Manchester, Rusholme Academic Unit, Manchester M14 5NP, UK

e-mail: rtel{at}gp-p84072.nhs.uk

Influenza and its related illnesses remain a major cause of preventable morbidity and mortality in the elderly worldwide. The current influenza vaccine campaign in the UK is only a partial success despite annual costly publicity campaigns. The aim of this study was to explore the influences on decision making by elderly people for influenza vaccine uptake. Twenty patients age 75 years and over were purposively selected from those eligible for influenza vaccination in an inner city general practice in England. In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with 10 patients who accepted and 10 who refused the vaccine. Those interviewed were concerned about maintaining their health, and had a good understanding of influenza, its transmission and prevention. The decision whether to accept or refuse the influenza vaccination was influenced by trust or mistrust of modern medicine, prior experience of vaccination and perceived risk from influenza. Newly acquired lay experience and personal perceived risk from influenza seemed to be more important catalysts for the change in vaccination uptake than professional recommendation or advertising by official government health agencies. In order to improve uptake rates, the official message promoting vaccine uptake needs to take more account of lay knowledge and the subjective assessment of risk.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
M. H. Coady, S. Galea, S. Blaney, D. C. Ompad, S. Sisco, D. Vlahov, and for the Project Viva Intervention Working Group
Project VIVA: A Multilevel Community-Based Intervention to Increase Influenza Vaccination Rates Among Hard-to-Reach Populations in New York City
Am J Public Health, July 1, 2008; 98(7): 1314 - 1321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Epidemiol RevHome page
D. C. Ompad, S. Galea, and D. Vlahov
Distribution of Influenza Vaccine to High-Risk Groups
Epidemiol. Rev., August 1, 2006; 28(1): 54 - 70.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Public Health (Oxf)Home page
S. Gallagher and R. Povey
Determinants of older adults' intentions to vaccinate against influenza: a theoretical application
J. Public Health Med., June 1, 2006; 28(2): 139 - 144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.