Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schofield, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Mishra, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schofield, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Mishra, G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Education Research, Vol. 18, No. 6, 678-692, December 2003
© 2003 Oxford University Press

Evaluation of a Health Promoting Schools program to reduce smoking in Australian secondary schools

M. J. Schofield, M. Lynagh1 and G. Mishra2,3

School of Health, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, and 1 Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, and 2 Department of Statistics, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia 3 Present address: Medical Research Council Human Nutrition Unit, Cambridge CB1 9NL, UK

e-mail: mschofi2{at}pobox.une.edu.au

This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness of a multicomponent Health Promoting Schools (HPS) intervention program in improving self-reported smoking outcomes among a cohort of adolescents in 22 public secondary schools in the Hunter Region of New South Wales, Australia. Pre-test surveys were completed by students in the first 2 years of secondary school, with a 2-year post-test survey. Multivariate analyses examined intervention effect for the main outcome, post-test smoking behavior, controlling for pre-test smoking status, school and other confounders. The sample comprised the cohort of 1852 students who completed both surveys. The results demonstrated that the HPS program failed to improve smoking behavior over the 2 years (equal increase of 10% in both groups). The program was successful in improving smoking knowledge, but not attitudes, in intervention versus control group (P < 0.001). Independent predictors of post-test smoking included: pre-test smoking [odds ratio (OR) = 5.44; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.20–9.28], being female (OR = 0.55; CI = 0.35–0.87), having more close friends who smoked (OR = 1.42; CI = 1.33–1.52), peer group having no clear opinion about smoking (OR = 3.23; CI = 1.27–8.27), having more positive and less negative attitudes towards smoking, and being less involved in school activities. We discuss methodological issues in multicomponent community-based interventions, and highlight the strengths and limitations of this study.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Tobacco ControlHome page
F Muller-Riemenschneider, A Bockelbrink, T Reinhold, A Rasch, W Greiner, and S N Willich
Long-term effectiveness of behavioural interventions to prevent smoking among children and youth
Tob. Control, October 1, 2008; 17(5): 301 - 302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.