Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gordon, J.
Right arrow Articles by Turner, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gordon, J.
Right arrow Articles by Turner, K. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Education Research, Vol. 18, No. 5, 580-591, October 2003
© 2003 Oxford University Press

School differences in pupil smoking: a consequence of a trade-off between health and education agendas?

J. Gordon and K. M. Turner

MRC Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8RZ, UK

E–mail: jacki{at}msoc.mrc.gla.ac.uk

Current policy documents stress that raising standards in education and health are inextricably linked, with schools identified as well placed to advance both agendas. This paper considers these assumptions in the light of data derived from 27 staff interviews conducted in two secondary schools. These schools served relatively disadvantaged communities, but differed in their pupil smoking rates with one school being ‘high-smoking’, the other ‘low-smoking’. It explores whether this difference reflects the differential emphasis placed by each school on education or health. Analysis reveals that the ‘low-smoking’ school subscribes to holistic values and operates according to a child-centred bottom-up philosophy offering a differentiated programme of pupil support contingent on needs. In contrast, the ‘high-smoking’ school maintains a narrow focus on educational outcomes, and its high expectations are viewed as running counter to those held by pupils and parents. The contrasting school philosophies bring different unintended consequences. The holistic focus of the low-smoking school is associated with tempered educational expectations, thus conflicting with recommendations in education policies. The singular education focus of the high-smoking school leaves little room for a health agenda, and can overlook and disenfranchise the educationally disinclined. The school systems’ impact on pupil engagement may explain their different smoking rates.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Health Educ ResHome page
K. M. Turner and J. Gordon
A fresh perspective on a rank issue: pupils' accounts of staff enforcement of smoking restrictions
Health Educ. Res., April 1, 2004; 19(2): 148 - 158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Health Educ ResHome page
K. M. Turner and J. Gordon
Butt in, butt out: pupils' views on the extent to which staff could and should enforce smoking restrictions
Health Educ. Res., February 1, 2004; 19(1): 40 - 50.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.