Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Connelly, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Connelly, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Education Research, Vol. 17, No. 6, 704-705, December 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Reply to the Behavior Change Consortium researchers: the real issue is health promotion

J. Connelly

Nuffield Institute for Health, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9PL, UK

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

In this brief reply to those Behavior Change Consortium (BCC) researchers who have entered into this useful exchange I want to do two things. First, I want to acknowledge that in my original brief critique I was not able (because of limitations of space) to adequately explain why I believed certain studies had to some extent succeeded in addressing certain important economic and contextual issues in their interventions. Although I did cite five studies . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?