Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, G. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, G. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Education Research, Vol. 17, No. 6, 700-703, December 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press


LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Response to Connelly

First at the Gates of Fire: can there be any survivors?

Geoffrey C. Williams

Department of Clinical and Social Sciences in Psychology, College of Arts, Sciences and Engineering, University of Rochester, PO Box 270266, Rochester, NY 14627, USA

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

I first read Connelly’s review of the Behavior Change Consortium (BCC) studies while on a family trip to Greece. I was engrossed in my reading Gates of Fire (Pressfield, 2000Go), an historical novel about the battle of Themopylae in 480 BC. Reportedly, 300 Spartans held off an estimated 2 million Persians for 7 days in defense of a narrow mountain pass, where superiority in the numbers of invaders was partially neutralized by the geography. Before all the Spartans were killed, they took the lives of perhaps 20 000 Persians. Pressfield describes the Persian commanders ordering their archers to shoot through their own soldiers to hit, by chance, a Spartan. My initial reaction to Connelly’s review was to feel as I imagine the Persian soldiers at the front of the battle might have felt when wounded by arrows fired by an ally. Although I continue to believe that some of . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
R. E. Glasgow, D. A. Dzewaltowski, P. A. Estabrooks, L. M. Klesges, and S. S. Bull
Response to Connelly. Response from the Behavior Change Consortium Representativeness and Translation Work Group: the issue is one of impact, not of world view or preferred approach
Health Educ. Res., December 1, 2002; 17(6): 696 - 699.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
J. Connelly
Reply to the Behavior Change Consortium researchers: the real issue is health promotion
Health Educ. Res., December 1, 2002; 17(6): 704 - 705.
[Full Text] [PDF]