Health Education Research, Vol. 16, No. 4, 507-508,
August 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR |
Response to Pasick
Health Communication Research Laboratory, School of Public Health, St Louis University, St Louis, MO 63108 and
1 Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center and Prevention and Control Program, Duke University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
We appreciate Dr Pasick's and others' (Rimer, 2000
) thoughtful responses to our Editorial (Kreuter and Skinner, 2000
), and shared interest in arriving at common definitions for tailoring and targeting. Before addressing Dr Pasick's concerns specifically, we would like to call attention to the considerable common ground in our perspectives, as well as that shared with Dr Rimer. First, implicit in our Editorial and in the responses from Pasick and Rimer is endorsement of the health education truism that any program or educational
References
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. K. Halder, J. A. Tiro, B. Glassman, W. Rakowski, M. E. Fernandez, C. A. Perez, and S. W. Vernon Lessons Learned From Developing a Tailored Print Intervention: A Guide for Practitioners and Researchers New to Tailoring Health Promot Pract, July 1, 2008; 9(3): 281 - 288. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Vernon, D. J. del Junco, J. A. Tiro, S. P. Coan, C. A. Perz, L. A. Bastian, W. Rakowski, W. Chan, D. R. Lairson, A. McQueen, et al. Promoting Regular Mammography Screening II. Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial in US Women Veterans J Natl Cancer Inst, March 5, 2008; 100(5): 347 - 358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

