Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Connelly, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Connelly, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Education Research, Vol. 16, No. 2, 115-120, April 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press


Editorial

Critical realism and health promotion: effective practice needs an effective theory

Jim Connelly

Senior Lecturer in Public Health Medicine, Nuffield Institute for Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

Critical realism (CR) is a realist theory that has been applied to explain and ground claims of knowledge, truth, progress and reality obtained through research in both natural and social sciences (Bhaskar, 1975Go, 1989Go; Archer and Bhaskar et al., 1998Go). CR in the social sciences, including research into health promotion, confronts other theories as inadequate in both explanatory resources and, importantly, as ethically indeterminate. For example, attempts to reach consensus amongst actors in particular social circumstances is a major aspiration and activity of researchers who espouse social constructionism as a theoretical grounds (Guba and Lincoln, 1989Go). For CR, however, any such consensus would be required to be supportable on the objective moral criteria of equality, justice and freedom (Bhaskar, 1989Go) as well as on the truth of the actor's beliefs. CR therefore has specific and exacting standards for any consensus-forming approach.

In these opening . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Causal powers

CR as a research method and practice orientation

CR does not accept the fact–value distinction

CR as a foundation for practice

Conclusion

Notes

References


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Focus Autism Other Dev DisablHome page
G. King, D. Baxter, P. Rosenbaum, L. Zwaigenbaum, and A. Bates
Belief Systems of Families of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders or Down Syndrome
Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, March 1, 2009; 24(1): 50 - 64.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health (London)Home page
A. M. Clark, P. D. MacIntyre, and J. Cruickshank
A critical realist approach to understanding and evaluating heart health programmes
Health (London) , October 1, 2007; 11(4): 513 - 539.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
D. Oliver, J. B Connelly, C. R Victor, F. E Shaw, A. Whitehead, Y. Genc, A. Vanoli, F. C Martin, and M. A Gosney
Strategies to prevent falls and fractures in hospitals and care homes and effect of cognitive impairment: systematic review and meta-analyses
BMJ, January 13, 2007; 334(7584): 82 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Public Health (Oxf)Home page
J. Connelly
More public health theory please - but make it adequate
J. Public Health Med., December 1, 2005; 27(4): 315 - 315.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
J. Connelly, J. Green, L. Lechner, M. B. Mittelmark, A. S. Rigby, and C. Roberts
The European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach (ESFA) project: Observations by Six Commentators
Health Educ. Res., December 1, 2003; 18(6): 664 - 677.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
J. Connelly
The Behavior Change Consortium studies: missed opportunities--individual focus with an inadequate engagement with personhood and socio-economic realities
Health Educ. Res., December 1, 2002; 17(6): 691 - 695.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
J. Connelly
Reply to the Behavior Change Consortium researchers: the real issue is health promotion
Health Educ. Res., December 1, 2002; 17(6): 704 - 705.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
K. Tones
Reveille for Radicals! The paramount purpose of health education?
Health Educ. Res., February 1, 2002; 17(1): 1 - 5.
[Full Text] [PDF]