Skip Navigation



Health Education Research Advance Access published online on October 19, 2009
Health Education Research, doi:10.1093/her/cyp062
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
25/1/1    most recent
cyp062v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crosby, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lang, D. L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crosby, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lang, D. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Balancing rigor against the inherent limitations of investigating hard-to-reach populations

Richard A. Crosby1,*, Laura F. Salazar2,3, Ralph J. DiClemente25 and Delia L. Lang2,3

1 College of Public Health at the University of Kentucky, 121 Washington Avenue, Lexington, KY 40506-0003, USA
2 Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
3 Emory Center for AIDS Research, Atlanta, GA, USA
4 Department of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology and Immunology
5 Department of Medicine (Infectious Diseases), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA

Correspondence to: * Correspondence to: R. A. Crosby. E-mail: crosby{at}uky.edu

Maintaining rigor in research is critical; however, this need must be balanced by the necessity of conducting studies in populations where inherent barriers exist relative to key issues such as recruitment, attrition, sampling, sample size, assessment techniques, psychometric rigor, the identification of mediators and moderators and the practical relevance of the research question itself. Ultimately, the value of a study in health promotion should be judged on the practicality of the research question within the context of the target population. Striking the perfect balance between rigor and practicality to the field is a question that health promotion researchers and professionals need to determine through ongoing dialogue and debate.

Received on January 15, 2009; accepted on September 18, 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.