Skip Navigation



Health Education Research Advance Access published online on December 6, 2007
Health Education Research, doi:10.1093/her/cym075
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/5/880    most recent
cym075v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kroeze, W.
Right arrow Articles by Brug, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kroeze, W.
Right arrow Articles by Brug, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Examining the minimal required elements of a computer-tailored intervention aimed at dietary fat reduction: results of a randomized controlled dismantling study

Willemieke Kroeze1,*, Anke Oenema1, Pieter C. Dagnelie2 and Johannes Brug1,3

1 Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
2 Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
3 Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Correspondence to: * Correspondence to: W. Kroeze. E-mail: w.kroeze{at}erasmusmc.nl

This study investigated the minimally required feedback elements of a computer-tailored dietary fat reduction intervention to be effective in improving fat intake. In all 588 Healthy Dutch adults were randomly allocated to one of four conditions in an randomized controlled trial: (i) feedback on dietary fat intake [personal feedback (P feedback)], (ii) P feedback and feedback on one's own behavior relative to that of peers [personal–normative feedback (PN feedback)], (iii) PN feedback and practical suggestions on how to change fat intake [personal—normative—action feedback (PNA feedback)] and (iv) generic information. Data on fat intake, awareness of one's own fat intake and intention to change were collected 1 and 6 months post-intervention. Between-group differences were tested with analysis of variance. Among respondents with high fat intakes at baseline (risk consumers) and those who underestimated their fat intake at baseline (underestimators), differences in awareness and (saturated) fat intake were found between the generic and PNA feedback conditions. Compared with generic information P feedback was more effective in changing awareness and intention among the underestimators, and PN feedback was more effective in changing intention among both risk consumers and underestimators. In conclusion, the combination of personal, normative and action feedback is required for inducing change in fat intake and improving awareness of fat intake.

Received on December 21, 2006; accepted on September 19, 2007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.