Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carmel, S.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenberg, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carmel, S.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenberg, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Education Research, Vol. 9, No. 4, 433-447, 1994
© 1994 Oxford University Press


other

The role of age and an expanded Health Belief Model in predicting skin cancer protective behavior

Sara Carmel, Esther Shani1 and Lior Rosenberg1

Department of the Sociology of Health, University Center for the Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Beer-Sheva
1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Soroka Medical Center Beer-Sheva, Israel

Skin cancer (SC), the most common form of cancer in the US, with a rapidly growing incidence, has become a target for health education. Sun exposure protective behavior (SEPB) is currently believed to be the best means to prevent it. Focusing on age differences, this paper applies an expansion of the Health Belief Model (HBM) to the prediction of engagement in SC protective behaviors in four age-groups, following an intervention program. It is based on data collected by a structured questionnaire completed by 509 members of four kibbutzim in Israel. The results indicate that the proposed model explains the SC-related protective behaviors of the older age-groups (45+) much better than that of the younger groups (15–44). The older age-groups are also more likely to change risky behavior following the intervention. The youngest age-group (15–29), although being highest at risk for SC due to sun exposure habits, is least likely to change them and least likely to participate in the intervention. Beliefs about sun tanning, sun exposure habits (barriers) and degree of exposure to the intervention are the best predictors of the likelihood to engage in SEPB in the younger age-groups, while among the older groups the best predictors are the value of health and appearance. These findings suggest that health education programs should develop different messages for different age-groups. Regarding SC, it seems especially important to focus prevention efforts on adolescents and young adults by recruiting the beauty and fashion industries as well as legislation. The merits of age group analyses in the research of health behavior are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
F. Mielewczyk and C. Willig
Old Clothes and an Older Look: The Case for a Radical Makeover in Health Behaviour Research
Theory Psychology, December 1, 2007; 17(6): 811 - 837.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Education JournalHome page
L. Wright and R. Bramwell
A qualitative study of older people's perceptions of skin cancer
Health Education Journal, January 1, 2001; 60(3): 256 - 264.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
E. Shani, E. Rachkovsky, A. Bahar-Fuchs, and L. Rosenberg
The role of health education versus safety regulations in generating skin cancer preventive behavior among outdoor workers in Israel: an exploratory photosurvey
Health Promot. Int., December 1, 2000; 15(4): 333 - 339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.