Health Education Research, Vol. 8, No. 3, 345-357, 1993
© 1993 Oxford University Press
research-article |
Characteristics and participant perceptions of tobacco control coalitions in California
Health Promotion Resource Center, Stanford Center for Research in Disease Prevention, Stanford University School of Medicine 1000 Welch Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304–1885
1Tobacco Control Section, California Department of Health Services 601 North 7th Street, Sacramento, CA 95814, USA
The 61 local health departments in California have been mandated to form tobacco control coalitions as part of Proposition 99, the 1988 Tobacco Tax Initiative. A self-administered survey of 361 coalition members and staff was conducted approximately 1.5 years after coalitions were formed to identify key characteristics, functions, problems and successes of the coalitions. This report summarizes some of the views of member and staff respondents to the survey. Significant differences exist between member and staff views of coalition roles and responsibilities and judgments of each others' expertise. While both members and staff place value on well-functioning tobacco control coalitions, the differences revealed between member and staff predictors of coalition functioning and outcome appear to be mediated by varying perceptions of the role of the coalition. These and other related findings support several key assumptions underlying coalition development, and have implications for both practice and research.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. Ansell and A. Gash Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., November 13, 2007; (2007) mum032v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. C. Kegler, B. L. Norton, and R. Aronson Skill improvement among coalition members in the California Healthy Cities and Communities Program Health Educ. Res., June 1, 2007; 22(3): 450 - 457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. C. Zakocs and S. Guckenburg What Coalition Factors Foster Community Capacity? Lessons Learned From the Fighting Back Initiative Health Educ Behav, April 1, 2007; 34(2): 354 - 375. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Wells, E. W. Ford, J. A. McClure, M. L. Holt, and A. Ward Community-Based Coalitions' Capacity for Sustainable Action: The Role of Relationships Health Educ Behav, February 1, 2007; 34(1): 124 - 139. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. D. Butterfoss, L. L. Lachance, and C. E. Orians Building Allies Coalitions: Why Formation Matters. Health Promot Pract, April 1, 2006; 7(2_suppl): 23S - 33S. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. D. Butterfoss, L. A. Gilmore, J. W. Krieger, L. L. Lachance, M. Lara, J. R. Meurer, C. E. Orians, J. W. Peterson, S. W. Rose, and M. P. Rosenthal From Formation to Action: How Allies Against Asthma Coalitions Are Getting the Job Done. Health Promot Pract, April 1, 2006; 7(2_suppl): 34S - 43S. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. E. Metzger, J. A. Alexander, and B. J. Weiner The Effects of Leadership and Governance Processes on Member Participation in Community Health Coalitions Health Educ Behav, August 1, 2005; 32(4): 455 - 473. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. L. Granner and P. A. Sharpe Evaluating community coalition characteristics and functioning: a summary of measurement tools Health Educ. Res., October 1, 2004; 19(5): 514 - 532. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. C. Kegler and K. Miner Environmental Health Promotion Interventions: Considerations for Preparation and Practice Health Educ Behav, August 1, 2004; 31(4): 510 - 525. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. El Ansari and C. J. Phillips The Costs and Benefits to Participants in Community Partnerships: A Paradox? Health Promot Pract, January 1, 2004; 5(1): 35 - 48. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. H. Jos, M. Perlmutter, and M. F. Marshall Substance Abuse During Pregnancy: Clinical and Public Health Approaches J. Law Med. Ethics, September 1, 2003; 31(3): 340 - 350. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. S. Weiss, R. M. Anderson, and R. D. Lasker Making the Most of Collaboration: Exploring the Relationship Between Partnership Synergy and Partnership Functioning Health Educ Behav, December 1, 2002; 29(6): 683 - 698. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. C. Kegler, J. M. Twiss, and V. Look Assessing Community Change at Multiple Levels: The Genesis of an Evaluation Framework for the California Healthy Cities Project Health Educ Behav, December 1, 2000; 27(6): 760 - 779. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. J. Maciak, R. Guzman, A. Santiago, G. Villalobos, and B. A. Israel Establishing LA VIDA: A Community-Based Partnership to Prevent Intimate Violence against Latina Women Health Educ Behav, December 1, 1999; 26(6): 821 - 840. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. J. Chinman and A. Wandersman The Benefits and Costs of Volunteering in Community Organizations: Review and Practical Implications Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, March 1, 1999; 28(1): 46 - 64. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. M. Goodman, M. A. Speers, K. Mcleroy, S. Fawcett, M. Kegler, E. Parker, S. R. Smith, T. D. Sterling, and N. Wallerstein Identifying and Defining the Dimensions of Community Capacity to Provide a Basis for Measurement Health Educ Behav, June 1, 1998; 25(3): 258 - 278. [Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. C. Kegler, A. Steckler, K. Mcleroy, and S. H. Malek Factors That Contribute to Effective Community Health Promotion Coalitions: A Study of 10 Project ASSIST Coalitions in North Carolina Health Educ Behav, June 1, 1998; 25(3): 338 - 353. [Abstract]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Sussman, C. W. Dent, E. R. Galaif, A. W. Stacy, T. Newman, M. A. Moss, M. Hennesy, S. Craig, M. A. Pentz, and T. R. Simon Implementation and Process Evaluation of a Student "School-as-Community" Group: A Component of a School-Based Drug Abuse Prevention Program Eval Rev, February 1, 1997; 21(1): 94 - 123. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|