Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, S.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, S.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Education Research, Vol. 8, No. 2, 205-215, 1993
© 1993 Oxford University Press

research-article

Crutches, confetti or useful tools? Professionals, views on and use of health education leaflets

Simon Murphy and Christopher Smith

Health Promotion Authority for Wales, Brunel House 2 Fitzalan Road, Cardiff CF2 1EB, UK

This paper examines the views on and use of health education leaflets by a number of professional groups: health visitors, midwives, occupational health workers, pharmacists and school health education co-ordinators. Eighty nine percent currently obtain leaflets from health promotion units, with the exception of health visitors, professionals are largely satisfied with the units' service. Seventy six percent use commercial or sponsored leaflets primarily because of the large numbers and topics that are available. The numbers and type of leaflets used were found to vary across the professions. All professionals see an increasingly important role for leaflets in their work. A number of them, pharmacists and occupational health workers in particular, saw the numbers they use rising. These views were accompanied by lower levels of belief in a leaflets ability to increase knowledge and behaviour as well as lower levels of satisfaction with current leaflet use and a concern over the public's reception of leaflets. Methods of leaflet distribution to the public largely reflect the professionals' work contexts. Most popular were handing out leaflets with advice, leaving them in a public place and using them as a back-up to a meeting. A number of contradictions emerge between distribution practices and perceived effectiveness. Few professionals thought leaving leaflets in a public place was effective, and few health visitors and midwives believed giving leaflets to the family of a client was effective despite large numbers doing so. The implications of these findings for health promotion policy and practice are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Health Education JournalHome page
T. Seddon
Improving the health of drug-using prisoners: An exploratory study of drug information needs in male Young Offender Institutions
Health Education Journal, January 1, 2001; 60(1): 17 - 25.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Health Education JournalHome page
M. Caraher, L. Bird, and P. Hayton
Evaluation of a campaign to promote mental health in young offender institutions: problems and lessons for future practice
Health Education Journal, January 1, 2000; 59(3): 211 - 227.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Health Education JournalHome page
E. Mullan, A. Fry, and C. Tudor-Smith
Perspectives, practices and the Pharmacy Healthcare Scheme: a small-scale investigation of use of health-education leaflets among pharmacists in Wales
Health Education Journal, January 1, 1999; 58(4): 410 - 417.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Health Education JournalHome page
M. Dixon-Woods
Dissemination of printed information for patients: a qualitative study of general practices
Health Education Journal, January 1, 1998; 57(1): 16 - 30.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Health Education JournalHome page
P. Hunt
Development and evaluation of the Changing what you eat resources for primary care
Health Education Journal, January 1, 1995; 54(4): 405 - 414.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.