Health Education Research, Vol. 8, No. 2, 181-192, 1993
© 1993 Oxford University Press
research-article |
Scales for assessing perceptions of health hazard susceptibility
1Departments of Psychology and Human Ecology and Psychology, Rutgers-The State University of New Jersey New Brunswick, NJ 08901
2Mesa, Arizona Public Schools USA.
Two studies examined the effectiveness of a variety of commonly used likelihood scales (dichotomous scale, five–point verbally-labeled scale, odds scale, percentage scale, etc.) for assessing perceptions of personal susceptibility to health and safety risks. Two direct evaluation criteria (subjects' ratings of how easy it was to use a scale and of how well the scale reflected their feelings) and three additional measures of validity and reliability (the agreement of scale-derived ranks with a direct ranking, the magnitude of correlations between risk perceptions and appropriate risk factors, and the stability of scores over time) were used to compare the scales. Increasing the number of scale categories did not necessarily improve performance. In fact, a scale with seven verbally-labeled categories performed as well as or better than other scales on all evaluation criteria. These data may help health education researchers in selecting scales to measure perceptions of susceptibility to harm.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  E. L. Ding, N. R. Powe, J. E. Manson, N. S. Sherber, and J. B. Braunstein Sex Differences in Perceived Risks, Distrust, and Willingness to Participate in Clinical Trials: A Randomized Study of Cardiovascular Prevention Trials Arch Intern Med, May 14, 2007; 167(9): 905 - 912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. A. Robb, A. Miles, and J. Wardle Perceived Risk of Colorectal Cancer: Sources of Risk Judgments Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2007; 16(4): 694 - 702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Gurmankin Levy, J. Shea, S. V. Williams, A. Quistberg, and K. Armstrong Measuring perceptions of breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2006; 15(10): 1893 - 1898. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. D. Gurmankin, M. Helweg-Larsen, K. Armstrong, S. E. Kimmel, and K. G. M. Volpp Comparing the Standard Rating Scale and the Magnifier Scale for Assessing Risk Perceptions Med Decis Making, September 1, 2005; 25(5): 560 - 570. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. M. Lipkus, C. S. Skinner, L. S. G. Green, J. Dement, G. P. Samsa, and D. Ransohoff Modifying Attributions of Colorectal Cancer Risk Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2004; 13(4): 560 - 566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Cullen, M. D. Schwartz, W. F. Lawrence, J. V. Selby, and J. S. Mandelblatt Short-Term Impact of Cancer Prevention and Screening Activities on Quality of Life J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2004; 22(5): 943 - 952. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. A. Walker, C.K. Mertz, M. R. Kalten, and J. Flynn Risk Perception for Developing Diabetes: Comparative risk judgments of physicians Diabetes Care, September 1, 2003; 26(9): 2543 - 2548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. M. McBride, K. M. Emmons, and I. M. Lipkus Understanding the potential of teachable moments: the case of smoking cessation Health Educ. Res., April 1, 2003; 18(2): 156 - 170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. L. Taylor, R. A. Shelby, M. D. Schwartz, J. Ackerman, V. H. LaSalle, E. P. Gelmann, and C. McGuire The Impact of Item Order on Ratings of Cancer Risk Perception Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2002; 11(7): 654 - 659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. M. Radcliffe and W. M. P. Klein Dispositional, Unrealistic, and Comparative Optimism: Differential Relations with the Knowledge and Processing of Risk Information and Beliefs about Personal Risk Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 2002; 28(6): 836 - 846. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. M. Lipkus, M. Kuchibhatla, C. M. McBride, H. B. Bosworth, K. I. Pollak, I. C. Siegler, and B. K. Rimer Relationships among Breast Cancer Perceived Absolute Risk, Comparative Risk, and Worries Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2000; 9(9): 973 - 975. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. M. Lipkus, D. Iden, J. Terrenoire, and J. R. Feaganes Relationships among Breast Cancer Concern, Risk Perceptions, and Interest in Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer Susceptibility among African-American Women with and without a Family History of Breast Cancer Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 1999; 8(6): 533 - 539. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. W. Vernon Risk Perception and Risk Communication for Cancer Screening Behaviors: a Review J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, January 1, 1999; 1999(25): 101 - 119. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|