Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heimendinger, J.
Right arrow Articles by Light, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Heimendinger, J.
Right arrow Articles by Light, L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Education Research, Vol. 5, No. 4, 545-550, 1990
© 1990 Oxford University Press

other

Nutrition and cancer prevention activities in state health agencies

Jerianne Heimendinger, Susan Foerster1,4, Mildred Kaufman2 and Luise Light3

Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Cancer Institute Bethesda, MD 20892
1Nutrition and Cancer Prevention Program, California State Department of Health Services Sacramento, CA 94234–7320
2Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina School of Public Health Chapel Hill, NC 27514
3Burson-Marsteller Washington, DC, USA

This article reports the results of the first national survey of state health agencies to obtain opinions from key personnel about nutrition and cancer prevention activities. The issues discussed are relevant to all efforts to achieve the nation's nutrition-related chronic disease objectives for the year 2000. A total of 168 key officials responded, representing 67% of the State Health Officers, 83% of the Health Promotion/Health Education Directors, 85% of the Chronic Disease/Adult Health Directors and 98% of the Nutrition Directors. The majority of respondents felt that the science base linking diet and cancer was sufficient to warrant public health action, especially public education and interagency collaboration. Fewer agencies viewed environmental change, such as collaborative efforts with supermarkets, or efforts to mobilize whole communities as priorities. Agencies identified lack of funding and appropriate personnel as impediments to expanded programming. Support requested from the federal level included research grant monies, more applied research on dietary behavior change and the development of tested nutrition intervention packages. If the variety of national objectives for nutrition and chronic disease are to be met, federal and state agencies must jointly address the issues, improve the research base and develop collaborative health education interventions involving voluntary agencies, health care professionals, the food industry, mass media and consumers.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Health Educ ResHome page
I. De Bourdeaudhuij and J. Brug
Tailoring dietary feedback to reduce fat intake: an intervention at the family level
Health Educ. Res., August 1, 2000; 15(4): 449 - 462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.