Health Education Research, Vol. 5, No. 2, 125-137, 1990
© 1990 Oxford University Press
research-article |
A conceptual framework for developing and evaluating behavior change interventions for injury control
Department of Psychology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg, VA 24061-0436, USA
This paper addresses issues and research needs in the domain of behavior modification for injury control. Although much of the discussion focuses on traffic safety, the concepts and principles are applicable to all areas of injury control (e.g. on the job and in the home). Field research that has increased safety belt use is reviewed briefly to illustrate a tripartite classification of injury control factors (i.e. environmental, individual, or behavioral variables), and to introduce a heuristic framework for categorizing and evaluating behavior change strategies. A multiple intervention level hierarchy depicts a progressive segmentation of the target population as more effective (and costly) interventions are implemented; and a taxonomy of 24 behavior change techniques includes a scoring system for predicting short and long term effects of intervention programs. It is presumed that more risk-prone individuals require higher-level interventions, which are those that provide specific response information and extrinsic controls, while also eliciting active participant involvement, social support, and perceptions of autonomy. Although extrinsic controls increase the immediate impact of an intervention program, these techniques may jeopardize response maintenance when the program is withdrawn.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Staats, P. Harland, and H. A. M. Wilke Effecting Durable Change: A Team Approach to Improve Environmental Behavior in the Household Environment and Behavior, May 1, 2004; 36(3): 341 - 367. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Gielen and D. Sleet Application of Behavior-Change Theories and Methods to Injury Prevention Epidemiol. Rev., August 1, 2003; 25(1): 65 - 76. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. E. Boyce and E. S. Geller Encouraging College Students to Support Pro-Environment Behavior: Effects of Direct Versus Indirect Rewards Environment and Behavior, January 1, 2001; 33(1): 107 - 125. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. S. Geller Actively Caring for the Environment: An Integration of Behaviorism and Humanism Environment and Behavior, March 1, 1995; 27(2): 184 - 195. [Abstract] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Cobern, B. E. Porter, F. C. Leeming, and W. O. Dwyer The Effect of Commitment on Adoption and Diffusion of Grass Cycling Environment and Behavior, March 1, 1995; 27(2): 213 - 232. [Abstract] |
||||
![]() |
T. D. BERRY, M. R. GILMORE, and E. S. GELLER An Individual-Subject Approach To The Study Of Community-Based Interventions Environment and Behavior, July 1, 1994; 26(4): 451 - 476. [Abstract] |
||||
![]() |
W. O. Dwyer, F. C. Leeming, M. K Cobern, B. E. Porter, and J. M. Jackson Critical Review of Behavioral Interventions to Preserve the Environment: Research Since 1980 Environment and Behavior, September 1, 1993; 25(5): 275 - 321. [Abstract] |
||||

