Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bauman, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Saunders, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bauman, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Saunders, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Education Research, Vol. 4, No. 3, 377-382, 1989
© 1989 Oxford University Press

research-article

Asthma information: can it be understood?

Adrian E. Bauman, Nerida A. Smith1, Candy Braithwaite, Alison Free and Alison Saunders

Department of Public Health A27, University of Sydney 2006 Sydney, Australia
1Department of Pharmacy, University of Otago Medical School Dunedin, New Zealand

Asthma is an important public health problem in Australia on account of its prevalence, its under-recognition and inadequate self-management by many of those with the condition. There is a need for the development and dissemination of relevant and intelligible asthma education materials. However, a large proportion of written health education materials may not be understood by the people who are exposed to them. This study examined the comprehensibility of a variety of asthma education materials. The results suggest that most opportunities for asthma education are lost on a general audience—they are written at a reading age well above that of the general community. Only two pieces of asthma material had similar FOG reading age scores to a typical Sydney newspaper. All the other asthma materials were at least two reading grades higher. Non-parametric analysis suggested that these differences were all significant at the P< 0.01 level, even with the small sample size used (n = 10 observations per piece). It is recommended that careful attention be given to readability in the preparation of future asthma materials. The importance of readability assessment for other written health education materials is stressed, or valuable opportunities for community education will be wasted.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.