Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elkind, A. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Elkind, A. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Education Research, Vol. 3, No. 3, 257-266, 1988
© 1988 Oxford University Press


research-article

The presentation of an edited version of smoking behaviour

Andrea Knopf Elkind

Social Research Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Social Oncology, Christie Hospital & Holt Radium Institute Kinnaird Road, Withington, Manchester M20 9QL, UK

A longitudinal study of smoking among nurses and student teachers which utilized both questionnaires and interviews provided insight into the problem of measuring smoking behaviour. Some participants sought to present their own definition of the situation by editing their smoking behaviour. Editing included refusal to participate, discrepancies in their accounts of their behaviour and issues relating to differences between there searcher's definition of smoking and that of participants. Editing might also involve redefining behaviour by giving contradictory information at different points in time, and evasiveness. The study indicated how information may be revealed, altered or reinterpreted retrospectively. It also suggested some limitations of a longitudinal design in terms of the expectations of participants and the snap-shot examination of a dynamic behaviour, which was associated with gaps in the data collection. The outcome tended towards underestimation of both prevalence and consumption.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.