Health Education Research Advance Access originally published online on September 8, 2006
Health Education Research 2007 22(3):351-360; doi:10.1093/her/cyl091
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Substance abuse prevention program content: systematizing the classification of what programs target for change
1 Tanglewood Research, Greensboro, NC 27409, USA
2 Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Calverton, MD 20705, USA
* Correspondence to: W. B. Hansen. E-mail: billhansen{at}tanglewood.net
We conducted an analysis of programs listed on the National Registry of Effective Programs and Practices as of 2003. This analysis focused on programs that addressed substance abuse prevention from among those on the effective or model program lists and that had manuals. A total of 48 programs met these inclusion criteria. We coded program manuals for content that was covered based on how much time was devoted to changing targeted mediating variables. The value of this approach is that program content can be judged using an impartial standard that can be applied to a wide range of intervention approaches. On average, programs addressed eight of 23 possible content areas. Our analyses suggested there were seven distinguishable approaches that have been used in substance abuse prevention programs. These include (i) changing access within the environment, (ii) promoting the development of personal and social skills, (iii) promoting positive affiliation, (iv) addressing social influences, (v) providing social support and helping participants develop goals and alternatives, (vi) developing positive schools and (vii) enhancing motivation to avoid substance use. We propose that the field use such analyses as the basis of future theory development.
Received on September 29, 2005; accepted on July 18, 2006