Skip Navigation


Health Education Research Advance Access originally published online on August 2, 2006
Health Education Research 2006 21(5):674-687; doi:10.1093/her/cyl071
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/5/674    most recent
cyl071v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Victoir, A.
Right arrow Articles by Van den Bergh, O
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Victoir, A.
Right arrow Articles by Van den Bergh, O
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Smoking status moderates the contribution of social-cognitive and environmental determinants to adolescents' smoking intentions

An Victoir*, A Eertmans, S Van den Broucke and O Van den Bergh

Research Group for Stress, Health and Well-being, Department of Psychology, University of Leuven, Belgium

*Correspondence to: A. Victoir. E-mail: An.Victoir{at}psy.kuleuven.be

In this study, it was tested whether attitudes, self-efficacy, social influences and the perception of the school and home environments had different associations with intentions for adolescent non-smokers, occasional smokers and daily smokers. A regression model allowing for separate slopes of social-cognitive and environment variables accounted for 72% of the variation in intentions. For non-smokers, ease of refusing to smoke (ß = –0.06) and social influences favouring smoking (ß = 0.05) were linked to intentions. Occasional and daily smokers' intentions were associated with health consequences (ß = –0.05 and ß = –0.06, respectively) and ease of smoking/buying cigarettes (ß = 0.05 and ß = 0.24, respectively). Social influences favouring smoking (ß = 0.10) were also associated with intentions in daily smokers. In an extended model for current smokers (adjusted R2 = 0.45), context-cued nicotine cravings (ß = 0.27) were linked to daily smokers', but not occasional smokers' intentions. The results suggest that motivating adolescents to abstain from or to quit smoking implies working on different combinations of determinants in non-smokers, occasional smokers and daily smokers. Interventions for daily smokers should supplement motivational techniques with stratagems that allow smokers to reduce the number of cravings they experience in specific contexts.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.