Health Education Research Advance Access originally published online on October 11, 2005
Health Education Research 2006 21(2):268-275; doi:10.1093/her/cyh063
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Free school fruit—sustained effect 1 year later
1 Department of Nutrition
2 Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway
*Correspondence to: E. Bere. E-mail: e.t.bere{at}medisin.uio.no
This study reports the effect of a school-randomized fruit and vegetable intervention consisting of a subscription to the Norwegian School Fruit Programme at no parental cost, and the Fruit and Vegetables Make the Marks (FVMM) educational programme, both delivered in the school year of 2001–02. Nine randomly chosen schools received the intervention and 10 schools served as control schools. Participating pupils completed questionnaires at baseline (September 2001), at Follow-up 1 (May–June 2002) and at Follow-up 2 (May 2003). A total of 517 pupils (84%; mean age, 11.3 years at baseline) participated in all three surveys. At both Follow-up 1 and Follow-up 2, strong intervention effects were observed for all-day fruit and vegetable intake (effect sizes were 0.6 and 0.5 portions, respectively). The sustained effect at Follow-up 2, 1 year after the end of the intervention, can partly be explained by greater participation rates in the School Fruit Programme (standard paid subscription). We conclude that the effects observed are most likely due to the no-cost subscription and not due to the FVMM educational programme, and that providing pupils with a piece of fruit or a vegetable at school at no cost for the parents is an effective strategy to increase school children's intake of fruit and vegetables. The effect is also sustained 1 year after the end of the no-cost subscription, providing increased health benefits.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Wind, M. Bjelland, C. Perez-Rodrigo, S. J. te Velde, C. Hildonen, E. Bere, K.-I. Klepp, and J. Brug Appreciation and implementation of a school-based intervention are associated with changes in fruit and vegetable intake in 10- to 13-year old schoolchildren--the Pro Children study Health Educ. Res., December 1, 2008; 23(6): 997 - 1007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L Moore and K Tapper The impact of school fruit tuck shops and school food policies on children's fruit consumption: a cluster randomised trial of schools in deprived areas J Epidemiol Community Health, October 1, 2008; 62(10): 926 - 931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Fogarty, M Antoniak, A. Venn, L Davies, A Goodwin, N Salfield, J Stocks, J Britton, and S. Lewis Does participation in a population-based dietary intervention scheme have a lasting impact on fruit intake in young children? Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2007; 36(5): 1080 - 1085. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|