Skip Navigation


Health Education Research Advance Access originally published online on March 8, 2005
Health Education Research 2005 20(6):709-718; doi:10.1093/her/cyh021
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/6/709    most recent
cyh021v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kendrick, D.
Right arrow Articles by Burton, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kendrick, D.
Right arrow Articles by Burton, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

How useful are home safety behaviours for predicting childhood injury? A cohort study

Denise Kendrick1,4, Michael Watson2, Caroline Mulvaney1 and Paul Burton3

1 Division of Primary Care, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, 2 Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2HA and 3 Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 6TP, UK

4 Correspondence to: D. Kendrick; E-mail: denise.kendrick{at}nottingham.ac.uk

Little work has examined the utility of home safety behaviours in predicting childhood injury. This study examines the relationship between safety behaviours and child injury using a cohort of 1717 families, with 2357 children aged 0–7 years. Safety behaviours, and sociodemographic and family characteristics were measured using a validated questionnaire, and medically attended injuries were ascertained from medical records. Hospital admission rates were lower amongst children from families with fitted and working smoke alarms [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31–0.96], who stored sharp objects safely (IRR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23–0.84) and who had fitted stair gates (IRR 0.57, 95% CI 0.31–1.03). Not having a stair gate and not storing sharp objects safely had high sensitivities and negative predictive values for predicting hospital admission. These findings are unlikely to be explained by reductions in the risk of injuries these items are designed to prevent. Families with a range of safety behaviours may also be ‘safer’ in other ways. Further exploration of factors that may explain lower injury rates in these families is required. Information on safety behaviours may be useful for targeting and monitoring injury prevention activity.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CMAJHome page
J. C. LeBlanc, I. B. Pless, W. J. King, H. Bawden, A.-C. Bernard-Bonnin, T. Klassen, and M. Tenenbein
Home safety measures and the risk of unintentional injury among young children: a multicentre case-control study
Can. Med. Assoc. J., October 10, 2006; 175(8): 883 - 887.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.