Skip Navigation


Health Education Research Advance Access originally published online on September 14, 2004
Health Education Research 2005 20(2):214-225; doi:10.1093/her/cyg119
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/2/214    most recent
cyg119v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whitelaw, S.
Right arrow Articles by Watson, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Whitelaw, S.
Right arrow Articles by Watson, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Education Research Vol.20 no.2, © Oxford University Press 2005; All rights reserved

Whither health promotion events? A judicial approach to evidence

Sandy Whitelaw1,3 and Jonathan Watson2

1 University of Glasgow, Rutherford/McCowan Building, Crichton Campus, Bankend Road, Dumfries DG1 4ZL and 2 Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK

3 Correspondence to: S. Whitelaw E-mail: s.whitelaw{at}crichton.gla.ac.uk

This paper reports on a review undertaken for the Health Education Board for Scotland on ‘health events’. On the basis of a literature review and interviews with 20 professionals in the UK, it appraised the effectiveness of such activities, assessed their current extent and status, and ultimately considered whether they are useful and relevant within emergent contexts. It suggests that the evidence base for health events is relatively weak, particularly given the scale of such work. At best, all that can be said is that there is some evidence that some of these events have some use within very specific assumptions and values. Consideration is given to possible ways forward. The paper also considers a series of related issues that impinge on the assessment of complex health promotion interventions. From our field interviews, health events are perceived by most to be labour intensive and ineffective. Rather, they are undertaken for a range of pragmatic ‘public relations’ reasons that exist independent of knowledge, attitudinal or behavioural outcomes. This ambiguity of expectation coupled with a paucity of published high-quality literature led to the use of a judicial approach to evidence appraisal. It considers the ways in which this exercise could be undertaken, ultimately being sceptical of systematic meta-reviews.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
A Bauman, N Murphy, and A Lane
The role of community programmes and mass events in promoting physical activity to patients
Br. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2009; 43(1): 44 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.