Skip Navigation


Health Education Research Advance Access originally published online on May 20, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/4/380    most recent
cyg063v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (25)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giles, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mallet, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giles, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mallet, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Education Research, Vol. 19, No. 4, 380-391, August 2004
© 2004 Oxford University Press

An application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour to blood donation: the importance of self-efficacy

M. Giles1,2, C. McClenahan1, E. Cairns1 and J. Mallet1

1 School of Psychology, University of Ulster, Coleraine BT52 1SA, UK

2 Correspondence to: M. Giles; E-mail: ml.giles{at}ulster.ac.uk

Given that self-efficacy has emerged as a key construct in health psychology, this study set out to explore its utility in the context of blood donation as defined within the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB). An Ajzen and Fishbein-type questionnaire was administered to 100 undergraduate students at the University of Ulster, Coleraine. A hierarchical multiple regression analysis provided strong support for the role of self-efficacy as a major determinant of intention. It not only helped to explain some 73% of the variance, but also made a greater contribution to the prediction of intention than the other main independent variables of the model—past behaviour and self-identity. Demonstrating the utility of self-efficacy in the context of blood donor behaviour not only has several important practical implications, but serves to further highlight its importance within the TPB.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Health Promot PractHome page
B. D. Johnston, E. Bennett, L. Quan, D. Gonzalez-Walker, B. Crispin, and B. Ebel
Factors Influencing Booster Seat Use in a Multiethnic Community: Lessons for Program Implementation
Health Promot Pract, July 1, 2009; 10(3): 411 - 418.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Health Educ ResHome page
A. F. G. Goebbels, J. M. Nicholson, K. Walsh, and H. De Vries
Teachers' reporting of suspected child abuse and neglect: behaviour and determinants
Health Educ. Res., December 1, 2008; 23(6): 941 - 951.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Health Educ ResHome page
C. McClenahan, M. Shevlin, G. Adamson, C. Bennett, and B. O'Neill
Testicular self-examination: a test of the health belief model and the theory of planned behaviour
Health Educ. Res., April 1, 2007; 22(2): 272 - 284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.