Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lintonen, T. P.
Right arrow Articles by Konu, A. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lintonen, T. P.
Right arrow Articles by Konu, A. I.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Education Research, Vol. 19, No. 1, 64-70, February 1, 2004
© 2004 Oxford University Press

The misperceived social norm of drunkenness among early adolescents in Finland

T. P. Lintonen1,2 and A. I. Konu1

1 Tampere School of Public Health, 33014 University of Tampere, Finland 2 Correspondence to: T.P. Lintonen; e-mail: tomi.lintonen@uta.fi

Adolescents tend to overestimate peer drinking; the resulting misperception of the social norm predicts the child’s own future drinking. This study examined the misperception’s relatedness to a person’s drinking pattern in order to facilitate the segmentation of the audience for health education interventions. Adolescent Health and Lifestyle Survey (Finland) data on 14 year olds’ drinking patterns and perceptions of peer drinking were gathered using self-administered mailed questionnaires in 1989 (N = 3105, response rate 77%), 1995 (N = 8382, 79%) and 2001 (N = 7292, 70%). The perceptions of peer drinking were significantly related to respondents’ drinking patterns. Non-drinkers and those drinking recurrently until drunkenness held reasonably correct views of their peers’ drinking. However, the segment between these two extremes comprising around half of the cohort incorrectly thought that their peers drank more; they misperceived the normative drinking pattern to be drunkenness. From health education perspective, three different target audiences can be identified: non-drinkers, moderate drinkers and heavy drinkers. The intermediate group, drinkers not normally getting drunk, holds the view most influenced by the social norm misperception and are likely to feel pressured to increase their drinking. The social norms marketing approach to health education should find this group the most viable target.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Alcohol AlcoholHome page
C. P. M. WEBB, E. J. BROMET, S. GLUZMAN, N. L. TINTLE, J. E. SCHWARTZ, S. KOSTYUCHENKO, and J. M. HAVENAAR
EPIDEMIOLOGY OF HEAVY ALCOHOL USE IN UKRAINE: FINDINGS FROM THE WORLD MENTAL HEALTH SURVEY
Alcohol Alcohol., July 1, 2005; 40(4): 327 - 335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Alcohol AlcoholHome page
T. LINTONEN, S. AHLSTROM, and L. METSO
THE RELIABILITY OF SELF-REPORTED DRINKING IN ADOLESCENCE
Alcohol Alcohol., July 1, 2004; 39(4): 362 - 368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.