Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ausems, M.
Right arrow Articles by De Vries, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ausems, M.
Right arrow Articles by De Vries, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Education Research, Vol. 19, No. 1, 51-63, February 1, 2004
© 2004 Oxford University Press

Effects of in-school and tailored out-of-school smoking prevention among Dutch vocational school students

Marlein Ausems1,2, Ilse Mesters1, Gerard van Breukelen1 and Hein De Vries1

1 Maastricht Health Research Institute for Prevention and Care, Netherlands School of Primary Care Research, Department of Health Education and Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands 2 Correspondence to: M. Ausems; e-mail: m.ausems{at}gvo.unimaas.nl

This paper evaluates a smoking prevention intervention aimed at vocational school students, consisting of an existing Dutch in-school program (three lessons each lasting 50 min) and a computer-based tailored out-of-school program (three tailored letters with smoking prevention messages mailed to students’ homes). Nineteen schools that already participated in the in-school program were randomly assigned to the in-school or to the combined in-school and out-of-school condition. The remaining 17 schools were randomly assigned to the out-of-school condition or to the control group. Effect outcomes were assessed at 6, 12 and 18 months after a pre-test, and were based on initiation among never-smokers and continuation among ever-smokers. Twelve months after the pre-test (post-test 2), the in-school intervention was successful in preventing vocational school students from continuing to smoke, compared with students in the control condition [odds ratio (OR) = 0.49; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.29–0.84]. Eighteen months after the pre-test (post-test 3), the tailored out-of-school intervention was successful in preventing smoking initiation, compared with students in the control condition (OR = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.18–0.96). The effect of the combined approach was not larger than the sum of the effects of the in-school and the out-of-school effects.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
T. P. Lintonen, A. I. Konu, and D. Seedhouse
Information technology in health promotion
Health Educ. Res., June 1, 2008; 23(3): 560 - 566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
H de Vries, M Candel, R Engels, and L Mercken
Challenges to the peer influence paradigm: results for 12-13 year olds from six European countries from the European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach study.
Tob. Control, April 1, 2006; 15(2): 83 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
H. de Vries, F. Dijk, J. Wetzels, A. Mudde, S. Kremers, C. Ariza, P. D. Vitoria, A. Fielder, K. Holm, K. Janssen, et al.
The European Smoking prevention Framework Approach (ESFA): effects after 24 and 30 months
Health Educ. Res., February 1, 2006; 21(1): 116 - 132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.