Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levy, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by Friend, K. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Levy, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by Friend, K. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Education Research, Vol. 18, No. 5, 592-609, October 2003
© 2003 Oxford University Press

The effects of clean indoor air laws: what do we know and what do we need to know?

David T. Levy and Karen B. Friend1

Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, University of Baltimore, 11710 Beltsville Drive, Calverton, MD 20705, and 1 Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Box G-BH, Providence, RI 02912, USA

E-mail: Levy{at}pire.org

Our objective was to review the research on the effects of public clean air laws on smoking rates, compare these effects to those found in studies on the impact of private worksite restrictions and derive estimates of the potential reductions in smoking rates that might be expected from the implementation of the two types of policies. Data sources were computerized databases, references identified from pertinent peer-reviewed journal articles and books, and suggestions by experts on tobacco control policy. Comprehensive public clean air laws have the potential to reduce prevalence and consumption rates of the entire population (including non-working and non-indoor working smokers) by about 10%. Studies on private worksite regulations also suggest that strong worksite restrictions have the potential to reduce the prevalence rate of the entire population by about 6% over the long-term and the quantity smoked by continuing smokers by 2–8%, depending on the length of time after the ban. Further research is needed on the effects of the different types of public clean air policies on the entire smoking population and on different sociodemographic groups, how the effects of public clean indoor air laws depend on private restrictions already in place, and how the effect of private restrictions depend on whether or not they are supported by public clean air laws.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Human ResourcesHome page
C. S. Carpenter
The Effects of Local Workplace Smoking Laws on Smoking Restrictions and Exposure to Smoke at Work
J. Human Resources, October 1, 2009; 44(4): 1023 - 1046.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nicotine Tob ResHome page
M. T. Botello-Harbaum, D. L. Haynie, R. J. Iannotti, J. Wang, L. Gase, and B. Simons-Morton
Tobacco control policy and adolescent cigarette smoking status in the United States
Nicotine Tob Res, July 1, 2009; 11(7): 875 - 885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Public HealthHome page
B. J. Mullally, B. A. Greiner, S. Allwright, G. Paul, and I. J. Perry
The effect of the Irish smoke-free workplace legislation on smoking among bar workers
Eur J Public Health, April 1, 2009; 19(2): 206 - 211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJPHHome page
J. Niederdeppe, M. C. Fiore, T. B. Baker, and S. S. Smith
Smoking-Cessation Media Campaigns and Their Effectiveness Among Socioeconomically Advantaged and Disadvantaged Populations
Am J Public Health, May 1, 2008; 98(5): 916 - 924.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
M. T. Braverman, L. E. Aaro, and J. Hetland
Changes in smoking among restaurant and bar employees following Norway's comprehensive smoking ban
Health Promot. Int., March 1, 2008; 23(1): 5 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
D T Levy, S Benjakul, H Ross, and B Ritthiphakdee
The role of tobacco control policies in reducing smoking and deaths in a middle income nation: results from the Thailand SimSmoke simulation model
Tob. Control, February 1, 2008; 17(1): 53 - 59.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
R. Goto, S. Nishimura, and T. Ida
Discrete choice experiment of smoking cessation behaviour in Japan
Tob. Control, October 1, 2007; 16(5): 336 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
F. Barone-Adesi, L. Vizzini, F. Merletti, and L. Richiardi
Short-term effects of Italian smoking regulation on rates of hospital admission for acute myocardial infarction
Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2006; 27(20): 2468 - 2472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
D. T Levy, E. A Mumford, and C. Compton
Tobacco control policies and smoking in a population of low education women, 1992-2002
J Epidemiol Community Health, September 1, 2006; 60(suppl_2): ii20 - ii26.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Public Health (Oxf)Home page
S. J. Haw, L. Gruer, A. Amos, C. Currie, C. Fischbacher, G. T. Fong, G. Hastings, S. Malam, J. Pell, C. Scott, et al.
Legislation on smoking in enclosed public places in Scotland: how will we evaluate the impact?
J. Public Health Med., March 1, 2006; 28(1): 24 - 30.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
D T Levy, E Romano, and E A Mumford
Recent trends in home and work smoking bans
Tob. Control, September 1, 2004; 13(3): 258 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.