Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Philips, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Whynes, D. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Philips, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Whynes, D. K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Education Research, Vol. 18, No. 3, 318-328, June 2003
© 2003 Oxford University Press

Human papillomavirus and the value of screening: young women’s knowledge of cervical cancer

Zoë Philips, Stacy Johnson1, Mark Avis1 and David K. Whynes2,*

Trent Institute for Health Services Research, and Schools of 1 Nursing and 2 Economics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed;E-mail: david.whynes{at}nottingham.ac.uk

The study reports a questionnaire survey of female university students intended (1) to delineate their knowledge of cervical cancer and screening, and (2) to impute their valuation of the introduction of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing. It was found that almost 80% of respondents thought cervical cancer was a leading cause of cancer death amongst women. Most subjects consistently over-estimated the incidence of cervical cancer, consistent with the social amplification hypothesis. The major risk factors were accurately identified by the majority, although family history was emphasized to a degree unwarranted by epidemiological evidence. Subjects’ knowledge of the screening programme was accurate in some respects, but not in others, e.g. the majority under-estimated the abnormality rate and over-estimated the age at which abnormalities typically occurred. Subjects placed a premium on the increased accuracy which HPV testing might potentially offer, predictable from their beliefs about the performance of the existing screening programme. Policy makers can be reassured that female university students appear unconcerned about undergoing a test for a sexually transmitted disease, although their beliefs about cervical cancer and the power of screening are distorted, and their enthusiasm for HPV testing relates to an, as yet, unconfirmed belief in its accuracy.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. A. Tiro, H. I. Meissner, S. Kobrin, and V. Chollette
What Do Women in the U.S. Know about Human Papillomavirus and Cervical Cancer?
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2007; 16(2): 288 - 294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CA Cancer J ClinHome page
R. Anhang, A. Goodman, and S. J. Goldie
HPV Communication: Review of Existing Research and Recommendations for Patient Education
CA Cancer J Clin, September 1, 2004; 54(5): 248 - 259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.