Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (75)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dusenbury, L.
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, W. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dusenbury, L.
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, W. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Education Research, Vol. 18, No. 2, 237-256, April 2003
© 2003 Oxford University Press

A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings

Linda Dusenbury, Rosalind Brannigan1, Mathea Falco1 and William B. Hansen

Tanglewood Research, 7700 Albert Pick Road, Suite D, Greensboro, NC 27409 and 1 Drug Strategies, 1150 Connecticut Aveune, NW Suite 800, Washington, DC 20036, USA. E-mail: lindadusenbury{at}tanglewood.net

To help inform drug abuse prevention research in school settings about the issues surrounding implementation, we conducted a review of the fidelity of implementation research literature spanning a 25-year period. Fidelity has been measured in five ways: (1) adherence, (2) dose, (3) quality of program delivery, (4) participant responsiveness and (5) program differentiation. Definitions and measures of fidelity were found not to be consistent across studies, and new definitions are proposed. While there has been limited research on fidelity of implementation in the social sciences, research in drug abuse prevention provides evidence that poor implementation is likely to result in a loss of program effectiveness. Studies indicate that most teachers do not cover everything in a curriculum, they are likely to teach less over time and training alone is not sufficient to ensure fidelity of implementation. Key elements of high fidelity include teacher training, program characteristics, teacher characteristics and organizational characteristics. The review concludes with a discussion of the tension between fidelity and reinvention/adaptation, and ways of resolving this tension. Recommendations are made for developing a consistent methodology for measuring and analyzing fidelity of implementation. Further, researchers and providers should collaborate to develop ways of introducing flexibility into prevention programs.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Research on Social Work PracticeHome page
D. L. Fixsen, K. A. Blase, S. F. Naoom, and F. Wallace
Core Implementation Components
Research on Social Work Practice, September 1, 2009; 19(5): 531 - 540.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Remedial and Special EducationHome page
A. K. Griffith, K. Duppong Hurley, and J. L. Hagaman
Treatment Integrity of Literacy Interventions for Students With Emotional and/or Behavioral Disorders: A Review of Literature
Remedial and Special Education, July 1, 2009; 30(4): 245 - 255.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
Z. Sloboda, P. Stephens, A. Pyakuryal, B. Teasdale, R. C. Stephens, R. D. Hawthorne, J. Marquette, and J. E. Williams
Implementation fidelity: the experience of the Adolescent Substance Abuse Prevention Study
Health Educ. Res., June 1, 2009; 24(3): 394 - 406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
L. Buckley and M. Sheehan
A process evaluation of an injury prevention school-based programme for adolescents
Health Educ. Res., June 1, 2009; 24(3): 507 - 519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
K. Zvoch
Treatment Fidelity in Multisite Evaluation: A Multilevel Longitudinal Examination of Provider Adherence Status and Change
American Journal of Evaluation, March 1, 2009; 30(1): 44 - 61.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Education JournalHome page
J. Holliday, S. Audrey, L. Moore, N. Parry-Langdon, and R. Campbell
High fidelity? How should we consider variations in the delivery of school-based health promotion interventions?
Health Education Journal, March 1, 2009; 68(1): 44 - 62.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
M. G. Wilson, T. B. Basta, B. H. Bynum, D. M. DeJoy, R. J. Vandenberg, and R. K. Dishman
Do intervention fidelity and dose influence outcomes? Results from the Move to Improve worksite physical activity program
Health Educ. Res., January 23, 2009; (2009) cyn065v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
M Egan, C Bambra, M Petticrew, and M Whitehead
Reviewing evidence on complex social interventions: appraising implementation in systematic reviews of the health effects of organisational-level workplace interventions
J Epidemiol Community Health, January 1, 2009; 63(1): 4 - 11.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Promot PractHome page
R. K. Noonan and D. Gibbs
Empowerment Evaluation With Programs Designed to Prevent First-Time Male Perpetration of Sexual Violence
Health Promot Pract, January 1, 2009; 10(1_suppl): 5S - 10S.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Promot PractHome page
R. K. Noonan, J. G. Emshoff, A. Mooss, M. Armstrong, J. Weinberg, and B. Ball
Adoption, Adaptation, and Fidelity of Implementation of Sexual Violence Prevention Programs
Health Promot Pract, January 1, 2009; 10(1_suppl): 59S - 70S.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSISHome page
M. L. Stein, M. Berends, D. Fuchs, K. McMaster, L. Saenz, L. Yen, L. S. Fuchs, and D. L. Compton
Scaling Up an Early Reading Program: Relationships Among Teacher Support, Fidelity of Implementation, and Student Performance Across Different Sites and Years
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, December 1, 2008; 30(4): 368 - 388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Child MaltreatHome page
S. Self-Brown and D. J. Whitaker
Parent-Focused Child Maltreatment Prevention: Improving Assessment, Intervention, and Dissemination With Technology
Child Maltreat, November 1, 2008; 13(4): 400 - 416.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
P. R. Brandon, A. K. H. Taum, D. B. Young, F. M. Pottenger III, and T. W. Speitel
The Complexity of Measuring the Quality of Program Implementation With Observations: The Case of Middle School Inquiry-Based Science
American Journal of Evaluation, September 1, 2008; 29(3): 235 - 250.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Youth Violence and Juvenile JusticeHome page
A. A. Fagan, K. Hanson, J. D. Hawkins, and M. W. Arthur
Implementing Effective Community-Based Prevention Programs in the Community Youth Development Study
Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, July 1, 2008; 6(3): 256 - 278.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
LSHSSHome page
K. L. Pence, L. M. Justice, and A. K. Wiggins
Preschool Teachers' Fidelity in Implementing a Comprehensive Language-Rich Curriculum
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, July 1, 2008; 39(3): 329 - 341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Education JournalHome page
S. Audrey, J. Holliday, and R. Campbell
Commitment and compatibility: Teachers' perspectives on the implementation of an effective school-based, peer-led smoking intervention
Health Education Journal, June 1, 2008; 67(2): 74 - 90.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
C. L. O'Donnell
Defining, Conceptualizing, and Measuring Fidelity of Implementation and Its Relationship to Outcomes in K-12 Curriculum Intervention Research
Review of Educational Research, March 1, 2008; 78(1): 33 - 84.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied GerontologyHome page
J. C. Frank, C. P. Coviak, T. C. Healy, B. Belza, and B. L. Casado
Addressing Fidelity in Evidence-Based Health Promotion Programs for Older Adults
Journal of Applied Gerontology, February 1, 2008; 27(1): 4 - 33.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
S. Bisset and L. Potvin
Expanding our conceptualization of program implementation: lessons from the genealogy of a school-based nutrition program
Health Educ. Res., October 1, 2007; 22(5): 737 - 746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
M. L. Plummer, D Wight, A. I. N. Obasi, J Wamoyi, G Mshana, J Todd, B. C. Mazige, M Makokha, R. J. Hayes, and D. A. Ross
A process evaluation of a school-based adolescent sexual health intervention in rural Tanzania: the MEMA kwa Vijana programme
Health Educ. Res., August 1, 2007; 22(4): 500 - 512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJPHHome page
E. Mayo-Wilson
Reporting Implementation in Randomized Trials: Proposed Additions to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Statement
Am J Public Health, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 630 - 633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
V. Sanchez, A. Steckler, P Nitirat, D Hallfors, H Cho, and P Brodish
Fidelity of implementation in a treatment effectiveness trial of Reconnecting Youth
Health Educ. Res., February 1, 2007; 22(1): 95 - 107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
C. Melde, F.-A. Esbensen, and K. Tusinski
Addressing Program Fidelity Using Onsite Observations and Program Provider Descriptions of Program Delivery
Eval Rev, December 1, 2006; 30(6): 714 - 740.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
D. Ward, R Saunders, G. Felton, E Williams, J. Epping, and R. Pate
Implementation of a school environment intervention to increase physical activity in high school girls
Health Educ. Res., December 1, 2006; 21(6): 896 - 910.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
L. Rowling and V. Jeffreys
Capturing complexity: integrating health and education research to inform health-promoting schools policy and practice
Health Educ. Res., October 1, 2006; 21(5): 705 - 718.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
L. A. Rohrbach, R. Grana, S. Sussman, and T. W. Valente
Type II Translation: Transporting Prevention Interventions From Research to Real-World Settings
Eval Health Prof, September 1, 2006; 29(3): 302 - 333.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
J. Solomon, J. J. Card, and R. M. Malow
Adapting Efficacious Interventions: Advancing Translational Research in HIV Prevention
Eval Health Prof, June 1, 2006; 29(2): 162 - 194.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
L. Dusenbury, R. Brannigan, W. B. Hansen, J. Walsh, and M. Falco
Quality of implementation: developing measures crucial to understanding the diffusion of preventive interventions
Health Educ. Res., June 1, 2005; 20(3): 308 - 313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Promot PractHome page
R. P. Saunders, M. H. Evans, and P. Joshi
Developing a Process-Evaluation Plan for Assessing Health Promotion Program Implementation: A How-To Guide
Health Promot Pract, April 1, 2005; 6(2): 134 - 147.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
L. Faw, A. Hogue, and H. A. Liddle
Multidimensional Implementation Evaluation of a Residential Treatment Program for Adolescent Substance Abuse
American Journal of Evaluation, March 1, 2005; 26(1): 77 - 94.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
R. B. McNeal Jr., W. B. Hansen, N. G. Harrington, and S. M. Giles
How all Stars Works: An Examination of Program Effects on Mediating Variables
Health Educ Behav, April 1, 2004; 31(2): 165 - 178.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.