Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Houlding, C.
Right arrow Articles by Davidson, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Houlding, C.
Right arrow Articles by Davidson, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Education Research, Vol. 18, No. 2, 145-155, April 2003
© 2003 Oxford University Press

Beliefs as predictors of condom use by injecting drug users in treatment

Carolyn Houlding and Ron Davidson1

Hamilton Health Sciences, PO Box 2000, Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5, Canada and 1 Department of Psychology, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, West Australian 6009, Australia. E-mail: houldingc{at}hhsc.ca

This study was conducted to clarify (1) the extent to which health beliefs selected from Protection Motivation Theory can combine to correctly classify 72 injecting drug users (IDUs) as condom users or non-users and (2) which of the beliefs (‘vulnerability to a regular partner’, ‘vulnerability to a casual partner’, ‘self-efficacy’, ‘response efficacy’, ‘response costs’ and ‘social norms’) were most influential in this distinction. Results of a logistic regression indicated that these beliefs were significant predictors of condom use. Overall, 83.3% of participants were correctly classified according to condom use, with condom ‘non-users’ being more accurately predicted (94.0%) than ‘users’ (59.1%). ‘Vulnerability to a regular partner’ and ‘social norms’ were significant multivariate and univariate predictors of condom use, and ‘response costs’ were significant univariate predictors. IDUs were confident of their ability to use condoms, considered themselves highly vulnerable to HIV infection from casual partners and were confident in the efficacy of condoms to protect them from AIDS. However, the majority of IDUs were not condom users, particularly with ‘regular’ partners. Findings suggest that HIV prevention programmes should target beliefs regarding risks from known partners, perceived norms and negative consequences of condom use in order to increase condom use by IDUs in treatment.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
B. Stanton, M. Cole, J. Galbraith, X. Li, S. Pendleton, L. Cottrel, S. Marshall, Y. Wu, and L. Kaljee
Randomized Trial of a Parent Intervention: Parents Can Make a Difference in Long-term Adolescent Risk Behaviors, Perceptions, and Knowledge
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, October 1, 2004; 158(10): 947 - 955.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.