Health Education Research, Vol. 17, No. 5, 648-658,
October 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press
Evaluating the components of the Exercise Plus Program: rationale, theory and implementation
Schools of Nursing and 1 Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201 and 2 School of Social Work, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3550, USA
Recovery following a hip fracture is facilitated by participation in regular exercise. Despite the benefits of exercise, it is difficult to get older adults to initiate and adhere to regular exercise programs. The Attribution Theory of Achievement Motivation suggests that an individuals future involvement in an activity is based on assessments of prior experience with the activity. Conversely, the Theory of Self-efficacy states that self-efficacy expectations and outcome expectations are not only influenced by behavior, but also by verbal encouragement, physiological sensations and exposure to role models or self-modeling. These expectations then determine the individuals willingness to initiate and engage in a given activity. Using a 2x2 factorial design, the primary aim of this study is to compare these two theories. The effectiveness of the Exercise Plus Program will be compared to the individual components of the program (Exercise Training and Plus components) on both self-efficacy and outcome expectations, exercise behavior, activity, and specific physical and psychological outcomes. A total of 240 older women post hip fracture will be recruited from five different acute care facilities. This study will add to current knowledge by examining the impact of a combined exercise training/social learning intervention approach versus either alone.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Resnick, A. King, D. Riebe, and M. Ory Measuring Physical Activity in Older Adults: Use of the Community Health Activities Model Program for Seniors Physical Activity Questionnaire and the Yale Physical Activity Survey in Three Behavior Change Consortium Studies West J Nurs Res, October 1, 2008; 30(6): 673 - 689. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Giuliani, A. L. Gruber-Baldini, N. S. Park, L. A. Schrodt, F. Rokoske, P. D. Sloane, and S. Zimmerman Physical Performance Characteristics of Assisted Living Residents and Risk for Adverse Health Outcomes Gerontologist, April 1, 2008; 48(2): 203 - 212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Connelly The Behavior Change Consortium studies: missed opportunities--individual focus with an inadequate engagement with personhood and socio-economic realities Health Educ. Res., December 1, 2002; 17(6): 691 - 695. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Ory, P. J. Jordan, and T. Bazzarre The Behavior Change Consortium: setting the stage for a new century of health behavior-change research Health Educ. Res., October 1, 2002; 17(5): 500 - 511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


