Health Education Research, Vol. 16, No. 4, 471-479,
August 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press
Rattling the plate—reasons and rationales for early weaning
Centre for Public Health Nutrition Research, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health,
1 Department of Epidemiology and Public Health,
2 Tayside Institute for Child Health and
3 Department of Obstetrics, Ninewells Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK
4 Present address: Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Napier University, 74 Canaan Lane, Edinburgh EH10 4TB, UK
To identify a range of attitudes and beliefs which influence the timing of introduction to solid food, five focus group discussions were undertaken within a maternity hospital setting. These sessions explored early feeding behaviour, stimuli to changing feeding habits and subsequent responses in 22 primiparous and seven multiparous mothers (mean age 27.0 ± 4.8 years) with babies aged 8–18 weeks (mean age 13.0 ± 4.2 weeks). One-third of the participants had introduced solid food to their infants (mean age of introduction 11.6 weeks, range 2–16 weeks). Mothers believed that the introduction of solids was baby led and initiated by some physical characteristic or behavioural action of the infant. All mothers were aware of current recommendations to avoid the introduction of solid food until 4 months. Few knew why this should be and concepts of long-term ill health were difficult to conceptualize. The conflict between rigid feeding guidelines and flexible advice from supportive health professionals created confusion over the importance of good weaning practices. The current findings highlight issues relevant to the introduction of solid food, and provide a foundation for further research which can identify the relative importance of these factors and provide a rationale for the design of contemporary intervention strategies.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  F. Tatone-Tokuda, L. Dubois, and M. Girard Psychosocial Determinants of the Early Introduction of Complementary Foods Health Educ Behav, April 1, 2009; 36(2): 302 - 320. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R G Watt, K I Tull, R Hardy, M Wiggins, Y Kelly, B Molloy, E Dowler, J Apps, and P McGlone Effectiveness of a social support intervention on infant feeding practices: randomised controlled trial J Epidemiol Community Health, February 1, 2009; 63(2): 156 - 162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. P Ward Platt Demand weaning: infants' answer to professionals' dilemmas Arch. Dis. Child., February 1, 2009; 94(2): 79 - 80. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Sachs Routine weighing of babies: does it improve feeding and care? J Child Health Care, June 1, 2006; 10(2): 90 - 95. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. J. Heinig, J. R. Follett, K. D. Ishii, K. Kavanagh-Prochaska, R. Cohen, and J. Panchula Barriers to Compliance With Infant-Feeding Recommendations Among Low-income Women J Hum Lact, February 1, 2006; 22(1): 27 - 38. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M S Fewtrell, A Lucas, and J B Morgan Factors associated with weaning in full term and preterm infants Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., July 1, 2003; 88(4): F296 - F301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|