Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prentice-Dunn, S.
Right arrow Articles by Flournoy, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Prentice-Dunn, S.
Right arrow Articles by Flournoy, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Education Research, Vol. 16, No. 1, 81-84, February 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press

Effects of persuasive message order on coping with breast cancer information

Steven Prentice-Dunn, Donna L. Floyd and James M. Flournoy

Department of Psychology, University of Alabama, Box 870348, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0348, USA

The current study explored the impact of varying the order of message components on coping with breast cancer information. In a 2x2x2 factorial design, threat information, coping information and order of information were manipulated. College students read persuasive essays that varied in emphasis on threat of developing breast cancer and effectiveness of breast self-examination (BSE) in averting the threat of cancer. Participants who read the high-threat message reported higher intentions to perform BSE, more rational problem solving and more hopelessness than did those who read a low-threat message. The coping information messages produced a similar pattern of results. In addition, those who read the high-coping message reported less fatalism than did participants who read the low-coping message. When threat information was presented first, the high-threat message led to less hopelessness and reliance on religious faith than when the coping information was presented first. These results demonstrate the threatening health information energizes one to act in both adaptive and maladaptive ways, and that coping information decreases the tendency to respond maladaptively to the health threat. They also suggest that the order of presentation of the information may affect the extent to which people respond adaptively.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Health Educ ResHome page
R. B Fry and S. Prentice-Dunn
Effects of a psychosocial intervention on breast self-examination attitudes and behaviors
Health Educ. Res., April 1, 2006; 21(2): 287 - 295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Health PsycholHome page
R. A.C. Ruiter, B. Verplanken, G. Kok, and M. Q. Werrij
The Role of Coping Appraisal in Reactions to Fear Appeals: Do We Need Threat Information?
J Health Psychol, July 1, 2003; 8(4): 465 - 474.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.