Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by South, J.
Right arrow Articles by Tilford, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by South, J.
Right arrow Articles by Tilford, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Education Research, Vol. 15, No. 6, 729-741, December 2000
© 2000 Oxford University Press

Perceptions of research and evaluation in health promotion practice and influences on activity

J. South and S. Tilford1

Department of Applied Social Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP and
1 Centre for Health Promotion Research, Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds LS1 3HE, UK

This paper reports on a study undertaken with health promotion specialists working in the National Health Service in England. In-depth interviews were held with 25 people with the aim of investigating the place of research and evaluation in health promotion practice, the contextual factors that influenced such activity, and ideas about the place of research in future practice. Research for the purposes of evaluation was a core activity in specialist practice but research for other purposes was less often undertaken and while there was general interest to do more, it was not seen to be central to current roles. There was general awareness of the importance of evidence-based practice, of the debates surrounding appropriate evidence and methodologies to secure it, and commitment to evidence-based practice. At the same time it was acknowledged that most evaluation activity currently undertaken was insufficiently extensive or methodologically rigorous to have the potential to contribute to development of the evidence base. A variety of factors at the policy, health promotion unit and individual level served either to facilitate or to impede research and evaluation. The development of collaborative links with academic partners was seen to be an appropriate way of developing research in practice. Recommendations were made to build new and imaginative relationships between practice and academic institutions, and to develop collaborative research bids to secure resources which would increase resources available for evaluation. Some actions in response to findings from the project have already been put into place.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
E. L. James, C. Fraser, K. Anderson, and F. Judd
Use of research by the Australian health promotion workforce
Health Educ. Res., August 1, 2007; 22(4): 576 - 587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
R. Cameron, S. Manske, K. S. Brown, M. A. Jolin, D. Murnaghan, and C. Lovato
Integrating Public Health Policy, Practice, Evaluation, Surveillance, and Research: The School Health Action Planning and Evaluation System
Am J Public Health, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 648 - 654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Promotion & EducationHome page
J. Green, M. W. Perry, and C. Jones
Changements
Promotion & Education, December 1, 2006; 13(4): 6 - 7.
[PDF]


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
H. Turunen, K. Tossavainen, and H. Vertio
How can critical incidents be used to describe health promotion in the Finnish European Network of Health Promoting Schools?
Health Promot. Int., December 1, 2004; 19(4): 419 - 427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Education JournalHome page
S. Tilford and J. South
Research education in postgraduate health promotion: Does one size fit all?
Health Education Journal, January 1, 2003; 62(2): 101 - 112.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Promotion & EducationHome page
J. Green
Evidence-based health promotion practice
Promotion & Education, September 1, 2002; 9(3): 2 - 2.
[PDF]


Home page
Promotion & EducationHome page
J. Green
L'exercice de la promotion de la sante fondee sur des donnees probantes
Promotion & Education, September 1, 2002; 9(3): 5 - 6.
[PDF]


Home page
Promotion & EducationHome page
J. Green
Practica de la promocion de la salud basada en la evidencia
Promotion & Education, September 1, 2002; 9(3): 9 - 10.
[PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
A. M. Learmonth
Utilizing research in practice and generating evidence from practice
Health Educ. Res., December 1, 2000; 15(6): 743 - 756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.