Health Education Research, Vol. 15, No. 4, 469-483,
August 2000
© 2000 Oxford University Press
Process measures in an antenatal smoking cessation trial: another part of the picture
Discipline of Behavioural Science in Relation to Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, NSW 2308, and
1 Department of Obstetricsand Gynaecology, John Hunter Hospital,New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia
Correspondence to: R. Walsh, New South Wales Cancer Education Research Program, Locked Bag No. 10, Wallsend, NSW 2287, Australia
Data on provider and patient compliance can be crucial in understanding the degree of a health education program's effectiveness, as well as in identifying areas where the program requires modification. However, such data are rarely systematically reported in randomized trials. This report assesses the degree to which doctors and midwives complied with intervention protocols in a hospital antenatal smoking cessation trial, and also examines the program's acceptability to patients. Provider compliance was assessed principally via consultation audiotapes and provider-completed checklists. The audiotape analysis identified substantial compliance problems. For example, in relation to six specific smoking-related pregnancy risks, the proportions of Experimental Women informed about each individual risk ranged from 26 to 38% and the proportions receiving counselling items ranged from 52 to 79%. Doctors only informed a minority of Experimental Women of the increased risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (28%) and of the presence of toxic chemicals in tobacco (21%). Comparison of compliance data from audiotapes and provider checklists revealed there was no significant agreement in three of four cases tested. Experimental Patients completed questionnaires to assess recall of smoking advice and to rate 12 program features. Of specific Experimental Program elements, the videotape (85%) received the highest level of positive patient ratings and the lottery (42%) the lowest. The process evaluation indicated that the Experimental Program needed some modification to increase its suitability for routine application. The findings also support the value of including an objective measure of provider compliance.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Freund, E. Campbell, C. Paul, R. Sakrouge, P. McElduff, R. A. Walsh, J. Wiggers, J. Knight, and A. Girgis Increasing smoking cessation care provision in hospitals: A meta-analysis of intervention effect Nicotine Tob Res, June 1, 2009; 11(6): 650 - 662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Robert, J. Gittelsohn, H. M. Creed-Kanashiro, M. E. Penny, L. E. Caulfield, M. R. Narro, A. Steckler, and R. E. Black Implementation examined in a health center-delivered, educational intervention that improved infant growth in Trujillo, Peru: successes and challenges Health Educ. Res., June 1, 2007; 22(3): 318 - 331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Winickoff, S. E. Tanski, R. C. McMillen, B. J. Hipple, J. Friebely, and E. A. Healey A National Survey of the Acceptability of Quitlines to Help Parents Quit Smoking Pediatrics, April 1, 2006; 117(4): e695 - e700. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E Campbell, R A Walsh, R Sanson-Fisher, S Burrows, and E Stojanovski A group randomised trial of two methods for disseminating a smoking cessation programme to public antenatal clinics: effects on patient outcomes. Tob. Control, April 1, 2006; 15(2): 97 - 102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Winickoff, S. E. Tanski, R. C. McMillen, J. D. Klein, N. A. Rigotti, and M. Weitzman Child Health Care Clinicians' Use of Medications to Help Parents Quit Smoking: A National Parent Survey Pediatrics, April 1, 2005; 115(4): 1013 - 1017. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Winickoff, R. C. McMillen, B. C. Carroll, J. D. Klein, N. A. Rigotti, S. E. Tanski, and M. Weitzman Addressing Parental Smoking in Pediatrics and Family Practice: A National Survey of Parents Pediatrics, November 1, 2003; 112(5): 1146 - 1151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



