Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (47)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kreuter, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, E. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kreuter, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, E. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Education Research, Vol. 15, No. 3, 305-315, June 2000
© 2000 Oxford University Press

Are tailored health education materials always more effective than non-tailored materials?

Matthew W. Kreuter, Debra L. Oswald1, Fiona C. Bull2 and Eddie M. Clark1

Health Communication Research Laboratory, Department of Community Health, School of Public Health and
1 Department of Psychology, St Louis University, St Louis, MO 63108, USA;
2 Department of Public Health, University of Western Australia, writing from the Health Communication Research Laboratory, School of Public Health, St Louis University, St Louis, MO 63108, USA

While promising, the evidence in support of tailored health communication has not been overwhelming. One explanation is that tailored materials may be far superior to non-tailored materials in some cases, but only slightly better, no different or less effective in others. In this study, 198 overweight adults were randomly assigned to receive either tailored or non-tailored weight loss materials. Participants' cognitive, affective and behavioral responses to the materials were measured at an immediate and 1 month follow-up. Analyses compared those who received tailored materials to those who received non-tailored materials that were—by chance alone—either a good fit, moderate fit or poor fit, based on the match between behavioral characteristics of the participant and content of the non-tailored materials. Findings showed that good-fitting non-tailored materials performed as well or better than tailored materials for several cognitive, affective and behavioral outcomes. However, moderate- and poor-fitting non-tailored materials were consistently inferior to both approaches. The art and science of creating tailored health communication programs is still evolving. Data from this study suggest present approaches to tailoring are more effective than non-tailored materials in most, but not all cases. Specific recommendations are made describing ways to refine tailoring methods to maximize the effectiveness of this approach.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
F. Te Poel, C. Bolman, A. Reubsaet, and H. de Vries
Efficacy of a single computer-tailored e-mail for smoking cessation: results after 6 months
Health Educ. Res., December 1, 2009; 24(6): 930 - 940.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJPHHome page
L. Neuhauser, B. Rothschild, C. Graham, S. L. Ivey, and S. Konishi
Participatory Design of Mass Health Communication in Three Languages for Seniors and People With Disabilities on Medicaid
Am J Public Health, December 1, 2009; 99(12): 2188 - 2195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
L. I. Bouwman and H. F. M. te Molder
About evidence based and beyond: a discourse-analytic study of stakeholders' talk on involvement in the early development of personalized nutrition
Health Educ. Res., April 1, 2009; 24(2): 253 - 269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
B. J. Lutz, S. Kneipp, and D. Means
Developing a Health Screening Questionnaire for Women in Welfare Transition Programs in the United States
Qual Health Res, January 1, 2009; 19(1): 105 - 115.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Promot PractHome page
A. K. Halder, J. A. Tiro, B. Glassman, W. Rakowski, M. E. Fernandez, C. A. Perez, and S. W. Vernon
Lessons Learned From Developing a Tailored Print Intervention: A Guide for Practitioners and Researchers New to Tailoring
Health Promot Pract, July 1, 2008; 9(3): 281 - 288.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
P. A. Williams-Piehota, L. A. McCormack, K. Treiman, and C. M. Bann
Health information styles among participants in a prostate cancer screening informed decision-making intervention
Health Educ. Res., June 1, 2008; 23(3): 440 - 453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
M. C. Politi, P. K. J. Han, and N. F. Col
Communicating the Uncertainty of Harms and Benefits of Medical Interventions
Med Decis Making, October 1, 2007; 27(5): 681 - 695.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
L Gibbs, E Waters, J Sherrard, J Ozanne-Smith, J Robinson, S Young, and A Hutchinson
Understanding parental motivators and barriers to uptake of child poison safety strategies: a qualitative study
Inj. Prev., December 1, 2005; 11(6): 373 - 377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
A. Reubsaet, J. Brug, J. Kitslaar, J. P. van Hooff, and H. W. van den Borne
The impact and evaluation of two school-based interventions on intention to register an organ donation preference
Health Educ. Res., August 1, 2004; 19(4): 447 - 456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJPHHome page
M. W. Kreuter, C. A. Caburnay, J. J. Chen, and M. J. Donlin
Effectiveness of Individually Tailored Calendars in Promoting Childhood Immunization in Urban Public Health Centers
Am J Public Health, January 1, 2004; 94(1): 122 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
C. A. Caburnay, M. W. Kreuter, D. A. Luke, R. A. Logan, H. A. Jacobsen, V. C. Reddy, A. R. Vempaty, and H. R. Zayed
The News on Health Behavior: Coverage of Diet, Activity, and Tobacco in Local Newspapers
Health Educ Behav, December 1, 2003; 30(6): 709 - 722.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Promot PractHome page
B. Gerbert, S. Berg-Smith, M. Mancuso, N. Caspers, S. McPhee, D. Null, and J. Wofsy
Using Innovative Video Doctor Technology in Primary Care to Deliver Brief Smoking and Alcohol Intervention
Health Promot Pract, July 1, 2003; 4(3): 249 - 261.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
C. E. Werch, D. M. Owen, J. M. Carlson, C. C. DiClemente, P. Edgemon, and M. Moore
One-year follow-up results of the STARS for Families alcohol prevention program
Health Educ. Res., February 1, 2003; 18(1): 74 - 87.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
J. de Nooijer, L. Lechner, and H. de Vries
Tailored versus general information on early detection of cancer: a comparison of the reactions of Dutch adults and the impact on attitudes and behaviors
Health Educ. Res., April 1, 2002; 17(2): 239 - 252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Promot PractHome page
E. A. Baker, M. Kreuter, S. M. Homan, S. Starkloff-Morgan, R. Schonhoff, and A. Francioni
Using Community-Based Participatory Processes to Bring Health Education Technology to Communities
Health Promot Pract, January 1, 2002; 3(1): 83 - 94.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
G. L. Ryan, C. S. Skinner, D. Farrell, and V. L. Champion
Examining the boundaries of tailoring: the utility of tailoring versus targeting mammography interventions for two distinct populations
Health Educ. Res., October 1, 2001; 16(5): 555 - 566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.