Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (40)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dijkstra, M.
Right arrow Articles by Parcel, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dijkstra, M.
Right arrow Articles by Parcel, G. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Education Research, Vol. 14, No. 6, 791-802, December 1999
© 1999 Oxford University Press

Effectiveness of a social influence approach and boosters to smoking prevention

M. Dijkstra, I. Mesters, H. De Vries, G. van Breukelen1 and G. S. Parcel2

Department of Health Education, and
1 Department of Methodology and Statistics, University of Maastricht, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands and
2 Center for Health Promotion Research and Development, University of Texas, Houston, PO Box 20188, Houston, TX 77223, USA

Correspondence to: I. Mesters

This paper presents the short-term and long-term results of a randomized smoking prevention trial. The purpose was to evaluate two smoking prevention programs, a social influence (SI) program and a SI program with an additional decision-making component (SIDM). Moreover, the contribution of boosters was assessed as well. Fifty-two schools were randomly assigned to the SI program, the SIDM program or a control group. Half of the treatment schools were randomly assigned to the booster condition; the other half did not receive boosters. Both programs consisted of five lessons, each lasting 45 min, and were given in weekly sessions in grades 8 and 9 of high schools in the Netherlands. The most successful program was the SI program with boosters which resulted in a significantly lower increase in smoking rates (5.6 and 9.7%, respectively) compared to the control group (12.6 and 14.9%, respectively) at both 12 and 18 months follow-up. The results suggest that boosters can be an effective tool for maintaining or increasing the effectiveness of smoking prevention programs. It is recommended that the SI program with the booster be implemented at the national level, since this intervention showed the greatest behavioral effects.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
M. Ausems, I. Mesters, G. van Breukelen, and H. De Vries
Smoking among Dutch elementary schoolchildren: gender-specific predictors
Health Educ. Res., October 1, 2009; 24(5): 818 - 828.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
T. Smeets, J. Brug, and H. de Vries
Effects of tailoring health messages on physical activity
Health Educ. Res., June 1, 2008; 23(3): 402 - 413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
S. M. C. Vijgen, P. H. M. van Baal, R. T. Hoogenveen, G. A. de Wit, and T. L. Feenstra
Cost-effectiveness analyses of health promotion programs: a case study of smoking prevention and cessation among Dutch students
Health Educ. Res., April 1, 2008; 23(2): 310 - 318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
D. B. Buller, R. Borland, W. G. Woodall, J. R. Hall, J. M. Hines, P. Burris-Woodall, G. R. Cutter, C. Miller, J. Balmford, R. Starling, et al.
Randomized Trials on Consider This, a Tailored, Internet-Delivered Smoking Prevention Program for Adolescents
Health Educ Behav, April 1, 2008; 35(2): 260 - 281.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
S. Panday, S. P. Reddy, R. A. C. Ruiter, E. Bergstrom, and H. de Vries
Determinants of smoking among adolescents in the Southern Cape-Karoo region, South Africa
Health Promot. Int., September 1, 2007; 22(3): 207 - 217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Public HealthHome page
E. Vartiainen, M. Pennanen, A. Haukkala, F. Dijk, R. Lehtovuori, and H. De Vries
The effects of a three-year smoking prevention programme in secondary schools in Helsinki
Eur J Public Health, June 1, 2007; 17(3): 249 - 256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
H. de Vries, F. Dijk, J. Wetzels, A. Mudde, S. Kremers, C. Ariza, P. D. Vitoria, A. Fielder, K. Holm, K. Janssen, et al.
The European Smoking prevention Framework Approach (ESFA): effects after 24 and 30 months
Health Educ. Res., February 1, 2006; 21(1): 116 - 132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
S. Panday, S. P. Reddy, R. A. C. Ruiter, E. Bergstrom, and H. de Vries
Determinants of smoking cessation among adolescents in South Africa
Health Educ. Res., October 1, 2005; 20(5): 586 - 599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
I. T. H. M. Maassen, S. P. J. Kremers, A. N. Mudde, and B. M. Joof
Smoking initiation among Gambian adolescents: social cognitive influences and the effect of cigarette sampling
Health Educ. Res., October 1, 2004; 19(5): 551 - 560.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
R. Hanewinkel and M. Asshauer
Fifteen-month follow-up results of a school-based life-skills approach to smoking prevention
Health Educ. Res., April 1, 2004; 19(2): 125 - 137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJPHHome page
V. A. Foshee, K. E. Bauman, S. T. Ennett, G. F. Linder, T. Benefield, and C. Suchindran
Assessing the Long-Term Effects of the Safe Dates Program and a Booster in Preventing and Reducing Adolescent Dating Violence Victimization and Perpetration
Am J Public Health, April 1, 2004; 94(4): 619 - 624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
W. A. Markham, P. Aveyard, H. Thomas, A. Charlton, M. L. Lopez, and H. De Vries
What determines future smoking intentions of 12- to 13-year-old UK African-Caribbean, Indian, Pakistani and white young people?
Health Educ. Res., February 1, 2004; 19(1): 15 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
M. Ausems, I. Mesters, G. van Breukelen, and H. De Vries
Effects of in-school and tailored out-of-school smoking prevention among Dutch vocational school students
Health Educ. Res., February 1, 2004; 19(1): 51 - 63.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
H. de Vries, A. Mudde, S. Kremers, J. Wetzels, E. Uiters, C. Ariza, P. D. Vitoria, A. Fielder, K. Holm, K. Janssen, et al.
The European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach (ESFA): short-term effects
Health Educ. Res., December 1, 2003; 18(6): 649 - 663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
N. McBride
A systematic review of school drug education
Health Educ. Res., December 1, 2003; 18(6): 729 - 742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
H. de Vries, A. Mudde, I. Leijs, A. Charlton, E. Vartiainen, G. Buijs, M. P. Clemente, H. Storm, A. G. Navarro, M. Nebot, et al.
The European Smoking prevention Framework Approach (EFSA): an example of integral prevention
Health Educ. Res., October 1, 2003; 18(5): 611 - 626.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
H. de Vries, R. Engels, S. Kremers, J. Wetzels, and A. Mudde
Parents' and friends' smoking status as predictors of smoking onset: findings from six European countries
Health Educ. Res., October 1, 2003; 18(5): 627 - 636.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
M R Crone, S A Reijneveld, M C Willemsen, F J M van Leerdam, R D Spruijt, and R A H. Sing
Prevention of smoking in adolescents with lower education: a school based intervention study
J Epidemiol Community Health, September 1, 2003; 57(9): 675 - 680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.