Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaneko, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaneko, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Education Research, Vol. 14, No. 3, 433-441, June 1999
© 1999 Oxford University Press

POINT OF VIEW

A methodological inquiry into the evaluation of smoking cessation programmes

Masahiko Kaneko

Department of Sociology, National Defense Medical College, 3-2, Namiki, Tokorozawa, Saitama, 359-8513, Japan

Abstract

This paper examines a methodological controversy and aims to show the advantages of introducing an alternative methodological approach, i.e. the `scientific realist approach', into evaluation studies on health education programmes for smoking cessation. The methodological difficulties of the existing standard evaluation model, i.e. the quasi-experimental approach, are examined. This model fails to investigate how the programme setting influences outcomes (context problem) and draws attention away from understanding why programmes work because it adopts a `successionist' logic (causation problem). An alternative methodology, the scientific realist approach, is proposed in order to cope with such problems. This approach adopts the `generative' logic which looks at the matter of causation internally. This logic posits that the working of underlying mechanisms within a more basic level of reality causes relationships between visible events. According to the scientific realist approach, the actual outcomes of smoking cessation programmes follow from the workings of potential mechanisms whose functioning is afforded by contexts conducive to their operation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BMJHome page
B. Crump
Should we use large scale healthcare interventions without clear evidence that benefits outweigh costs and harms? Yes
BMJ, June 7, 2008; 336(7656): 1276 - 1276.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eval Health ProfHome page
M. Fishbein, M. Hennessy, M. Kamb, G. A. Bolan, T. Hoxworth, M. Iatesta, F. Rhodes, J. M. Zenilman, and Project Respect Study Group
Using Intervention Theory to Model Factors Influencing Behavior Change: Project Respect
Eval Health Prof, December 1, 2001; 24(4): 363 - 384.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
C. M. Sykes and D. F. Marks
Effectiveness of a cognitive behaviour therapy self-help programme for smokers in London, UK
Health Promot. Int., September 1, 2001; 16(3): 255 - 260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.