Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Backett-Milburn, K.
Right arrow Articles by McKie, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Backett-Milburn, K.
Right arrow Articles by McKie, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Education Research, Vol. 14, No. 3, 387-398, June 1999
© 1999 Oxford University Press

A critical appraisal of the draw and write technique

Kathryn Backett-Milburn and Linda McKie1

Research Unit in Health and Behavioural Change, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, and
1 Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill Health Centre, Westburn Road, Aberdeen AB25 2AY, UK

The draw and write technique is increasingly popular in health education research with children. It is generally employed in the setting of the school classroom and is promoted as a `bottom-up' approach which enhances participation by children. In this paper we critically appraise the use of this method. Against the background of a consideration of carrying out qualitative health promotion research with children we examine the origins and use of children's drawings in a number of disciplines and practice environments. We argue that, although the draw and write technique has made an important contribution to health education research, it fails to reflect the processes involved in the construction and collection of such data. A range of methodological, analytical and ethical issues are raised. We conclude that health education research with children must involve taking children seriously as social actors and query the assumption that drawing enables children to communicate their thought any more than does conversational language. We suggest that the development of research should be premised upon an appreciation of the social context and the world of the child.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nurs EthicsHome page
M. Brady
Hospitalized Children's vIews of the Good Nurse
Nursing Ethics, September 1, 2009; 16(5): 543 - 560.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
M. Horstman, S. Aldiss, A. Richardson, and F. Gibson
Methodological Issues When Using the Draw and Write Technique With Children Aged 6 to 12 Years
Qual Health Res, July 1, 2008; 18(7): 1001 - 1011.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
B. F. Piko and J. Bak
Children's perceptions of health and illness: images and lay concepts in preadolescence
Health Educ. Res., October 1, 2006; 21(5): 643 - 653.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qualitative ResearchHome page
P. Darbyshire, C. MacDougall, and W. Schiller
Multiple methods in qualitative research with children: more insight or just more?
Qualitative Research, November 1, 2005; 5(4): 417 - 436.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Education JournalHome page
J. M McWhirter, A. J Young, and N. Wetton
In a class of its own: Introducing a new tool for understanding adolescents' perceptions of the world of drugs
Health Education Journal, January 1, 2004; 63(4): 307 - 323.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ChildhoodHome page
S. PUNCH
Research with Children: The Same or Different from Research with Adults?
Childhood, August 1, 2002; 9(3): 321 - 341.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
F. Starkey and J. Orme
Evaluation of a primary school drug drama project: methodological issues and key findings
Health Educ. Res., October 1, 2001; 16(5): 609 - 622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
V. Morrow
Using qualitative methods to elicit young people's perspectives on their environments: some ideas for community health initiatives
Health Educ. Res., June 1, 2001; 16(3): 255 - 268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Child Health CareHome page
G. M. Miles
Drawing together hope: 'listening' to militarised children
J Child Health Care, December 1, 2000; 4(4): 137 - 142.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Education JournalHome page
J. Harden, K. Backett-Milburn, S. Scott, and S. Jackson
Scary faces, scary places: children's perceptions of risk and safety
Health Education Journal, January 1, 2000; 59(1): 12 - 22.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.