Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eyler, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by King, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eyler, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by King, A. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Education Research, Vol. 14, No. 2, 289-298, April 1999
© 1999 Oxford University Press

Key informant surveys as a tool to implement and evaluate physical activity interventions in the community

Amy A. Eyler, Jeffrey Mayer, Reema Rafii, Robyn Housemann, Ross C. Brownson and Abby C. King1

Prevention Research Center, School of Public Health, St Louis University, 3663 Lindell Boulevard, St Louis, MO 63108-3342, and
1 Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA

Correspondence to: R. C. Brownson

Key informant surveys are important tools for planning and evaluating community health programs. A survey was conducted to gather views on policies toward physical activity from four sets of key informants: physicians, church leaders, business leaders and civic leaders. Surveys were mailed to 797 key informants who were selected from 12 southeastern Missouri counties. For comparison, data from a telephone survey of 2106 persons in the general population were also analyzed. The majority (>85%) in all four key informant groups were very supportive of required physical education in schools, but less supportive (<69%) of 0government funding for places where community members can exercise. Physicians perceived community members as having somewhat greater access to places to exercise relative to the other key informant groups. Comparisons of the key informant surveys to the population survey indicated similar levels of support for physical activity policy. The information from this survey has been useful in identifying support for physical activity policy and gaining access to potential influences for community change. Since key informant research in the area of physical activity policy and cardiovascular disease prevention is sparse, there is a need for future studies.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
M. A Muhit, S. P Shah, C. E Gilbert, S. D Hartley, and A. Foster
The key informant method: a novel means of ascertaining blind children in Bangladesh
Br. J. Ophthalmol., August 1, 2007; 91(8): 995 - 999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Promot PractHome page
B. M. Reininger, M. Vincent, S. F. Griffin, R. F. Valois, D. Taylor, D. Parra-Medina, A. Evans, and M. Rousseau
Evaluation of Statewide Teen Pregnancy Prevention Initiatives: Challenges, Methods, and Lessons Learned
Health Promot Pract, July 1, 2003; 4(3): 323 - 335.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
L. M. Wen, M. Thomas, H. Jones, N. Orr, R. Moreton, L. King, P. Hawe, J. Bindon, J. Humphries, K. Schicht, et al.
Promoting physical activity in women: evaluation of a 2-year community-based intervention in Sydney, Australia
Health Promot. Int., June 1, 2002; 17(2): 127 - 137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.