Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (64)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oldenburg, B. F.
Right arrow Articles by Owen, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oldenburg, B. F.
Right arrow Articles by Owen, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Education Research, Vol. 14, No. 1, 121-130, February 1999
© 1999 Oxford University Press

Health promotion research and the diffusion and institutionalization of interventions

B. F. Oldenburg, J. F. Sallis1, M. L. Ffrench and N. Owen2

School of Public Health, Queensland University of Technology, Red Hill, NSW 4059, Australia,
1 Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, CA 92182-4701, USA and
2 School of Human Movement, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia

To examine the extent to which health promotion research is providing an empirical basis for the diffusion and institutionalization of effective interventions, we conducted a systematic audit of all articles in 12 public health and health promotion journals for the 1994 calendar year. We identified empirical/non-empirical and health promotion/non-health promotion articles. For each study, the health behaviours or outcomes studied, the target group, gender and setting were categorized. Each study was also categorized as belonging to one of four stages: basic research and development, innovation development, diffusion research, and research into institutionalization or policy implementation. Of all articles coded (n = 1210), 33.9% were identified as non-research, 39.5% were health promotion research and 26.6% were non-health promotion research. The vast majority of studies fell within the basic research and development stage (89.6%), with less than 1% categorized as diffusion research and only 5% as institutionalization or policy implementation research. The published studies reviewed provide a limited empirical basis for diffusion and institutionalization of health promotion programs. These findings suggest a need to more systematically monitor research input (funding) and research output (publications), and to develop a more explicit focus on the relevance of the stages of research innovation and development, the issues and/or behaviours addressed, the target population, and the research setting.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
A. Russell, S. Heckler, M. White, S. Sengupta, D. Chappel, D. J. Hunter, J. Mason, E. Milne, and S. Lewis
The evolution of a UK regional tobacco control office in its early years: social contexts and policy dynamics
Health Promot. Int., September 1, 2009; 24(3): 262 - 268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
K E Pickett, R G Wilkinson, and L S Wakschlag
The psychosocial context of pregnancy smoking and quitting in the Millennium Cohort Study
J Epidemiol Community Health, June 1, 2009; 63(6): 474 - 480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
B. J. Weiner, M. A. Lewis, and L. A. Linnan
Using organization theory to understand the determinants of effective implementation of worksite health promotion programs
Health Educ. Res., April 1, 2009; 24(2): 292 - 305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
M. Jansen, J. Harting, N. Ebben, B. Kroon, J. Stappers, E. Van Engelshoven, and N. de Vries
The concept of sustainability and the use of outcome indicators. A case study to continue a successful health counselling intervention
Fam. Pract., December 1, 2008; 25(suppl_1): i32 - i37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
M. K. Campbell, K. Resnicow, C. Carr, T. Wang, and A. Williams
Process Evaluation of an Effective Church-Based Diet Intervention: Body & Soul
Health Educ Behav, December 1, 2007; 34(6): 864 - 880.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AJPHHome page
R. C. Brownson, P. Ballew, K. L. Brown, M. B. Elliott, D. Haire-Joshu, G. W. Heath, and M. W. Kreuter
The Effect of Disseminating Evidence-Based Interventions That Promote Physical Activity to Health Departments
Am J Public Health, October 1, 2007; 97(10): 1900 - 1907.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
M. Aittasalo, S. Miilunpalo, T. Stahl, and K. Kukkonen-Harjula
From innovation to practice: initiation, implementation and evaluation of a physician-based physical activity promotion programme in Finland
Health Promot. Int., March 1, 2007; 22(1): 19 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
B. H. Marcus, D. M. Williams, P. M. Dubbert, J. F. Sallis, A. C. King, A. K. Yancey, B. A. Franklin, D. Buchner, S. R. Daniels, and R. P. Claytor
Physical Activity Intervention Studies: What We Know and What We Need to Know: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Subcommittee on Physical Activity); Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young; and the Interdisciplinary Working Group on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research
Circulation, December 12, 2006; 114(24): 2739 - 2752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
D. B. Abrams
Applying Transdisciplinary Research Strategies to Understanding and Eliminating Health Disparities
Health Educ Behav, August 1, 2006; 33(4): 515 - 531.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
L. Kwak, S. P. J. Kremers, M. A. van Baak, and J. Brug
Participation rates in worksite-based intervention studies: health promotion context as a crucial quality criterion
Health Promot. Int., March 1, 2006; 21(1): 66 - 69.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Diabetes EducatorHome page
T. L. Gary, F. Hill-Briggs, M. Batts-Turner, and F. L. Brancati
Translational Research Principles of an Effectiveness Trial for Diabetes Care in an Urban African American Population
The Diabetes Educator, November 1, 2005; 31(6): 880 - 889.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
M. K. Hunt, R. Lederman, A. M. Stoddard, A. D. LaMontagne, D. McLellan, C. Combe, E. Barbeau, and G. Sorensen
Process Evaluation of an Integrated Health Promotion/Occupational Health Model in WellWorks-2
Health Educ Behav, February 1, 2005; 32(1): 10 - 26.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
E. Wallin, B. Lindewald, and S. Andreasson
Institutionalization of a Community Action Program Targeting Licensed Premises in Stockholm, Sweden
Eval Rev, October 1, 2004; 28(5): 396 - 419.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
D. A. Dzewaltowski, P. A. Estabrooks, L. M. Klesges, S. Bull, and R. E. Glasgow
Behavior change intervention research in community settings: how generalizable are the results?
Health Promot. Int., June 1, 2004; 19(2): 235 - 245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
S. C. Jones and R. J. Donovan
Does theory inform practice in health promotion in Australia?
Health Educ. Res., February 1, 2004; 19(1): 1 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
S. Murphy and P. Bennett
Health Psychology and Public Health: Theoretical Possibilities
J Health Psychol, January 1, 2004; 9(1): 13 - 27.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
S. S. Bull, C. Gillette, R. E. Glasgow, and P. Estabrooks
Work Site Health Promotion Research: To what Extent can we Generalize the Results and what is Needed to Translate Research to Practice?
Health Educ Behav, October 1, 2003; 30(5): 537 - 549.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AJPHHome page
R. E. Glasgow, E. Lichtenstein, and A. C. Marcus
Why Don't We See More Translation of Health Promotion Research to Practice? Rethinking the Efficacy-to-Effectiveness Transition
Am J Public Health, August 1, 2003; 93(8): 1261 - 1267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
S. K. Osganian, G. S. Parcel, and E. J. Stone
Institutionalization of a School Health Promotion Program: Background and Rationale of the Catch-on Study
Health Educ Behav, August 1, 2003; 30(4): 410 - 417.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
M. Pankratz, D. Hallfors, and H. Cho
Measuring perceptions of innovation adoption: the diffusion of a federal drug prevention policy
Health Educ. Res., June 1, 2002; 17(3): 315 - 326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
B. K. Rimer, K. Glanz, and G. Rasband
Searching for Evidence about Health Education and Health Behavior Interventions
Health Educ Behav, April 1, 2001; 28(2): 231 - 248.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
A. M. Learmonth
Utilizing research in practice and generating evidence from practice
Health Educ. Res., December 1, 2000; 15(6): 743 - 756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.