Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Education Research, Vol. 12, No. 1, 143-150, 1997
© 1997 Oxford University Press


other

Behavioral science theory and principles for practice in health education

Christine Jackson

Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill, NC 27599–7400, USA

The value of health education practice lies in its effectiveness. Behavioral science theories have greater potential to enhance the effectiveness. of practice than is currently realized. Many have called for development of strategies to overcome current barriers to the use of theory in the field. Such strategies should explicate the potential of commonly taught behavioral science theories to facilitate practice and assist practitheories in using such theories. This paper presents one such strategy: a set of principles for practice, derived from multiple behavioral science theories and having many direct implications for practice. Health educators who are knowledgeable of these principles may be better prepared to consolidate their knowledge of multiple theories and better prepared to derive implications for practice from their theoretical knowledge. To the extent that health educators are proficient at synthesizing theoretical information and distilling from this information implications for practice, the utility of theory in practice should be enhanced.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
P. Goodson, B. E. Pruitt, S. Suther, K. Wilson, and E. Buhi
Is Abstinence Education Theory Based? The Underlying Logic of Abstinence Education Programs in Texas
Health Educ Behav, April 1, 2006; 33(2): 252 - 271.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Promot PractHome page
E. Kobetz, K. Vatalaro, A. Moore, and J. A. Earp
Taking the Transtheoretical Model Into the Field: A Curriculum for Lay Health Advisors
Health Promot Pract, July 1, 2005; 6(3): 329 - 337.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
A. Steptoe, S. Doherty, E. Rink, S. Kerry, T. Kendrick, S. Hilton, and S. Day
Behavioural counselling in general practice for the promotion of healthy behaviour among adults at increased risk of coronary heart disease: randomised trial • Commentary: Treatment allocation by the method of minimisation
BMJ, October 9, 1999; 319(7215): 943 - 948.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
J. H. Barlow, K. L. Shaw, and K. Harrison
Consulting the `experts': children's and parents' perceptions of psycho-educational interventions in the context of juvenile chronic arthritis
Health Educ. Res., October 1, 1999; 14(5): 597 - 610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
A. Steptoe, S. Doherty, T. Kendrick, E. Rink, and S. Hilton
Attitudes to cardiovascular health promotion among GPs and practice nurses
Fam. Pract., April 1, 1999; 16(2): 158 - 163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Education JournalHome page
S. Hilton, S. Doherty, T. Kendrick, S. Kerry, E. Rink, and A. Steptoe
Promotion of healthy behaviour among adults at increased risk of coronary heart disease in general practice: methodology and baseline data from the Change of Heart study
Health Education Journal, January 1, 1999; 58(1): 3 - 16.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.