Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Øygard, L.
Right arrow Articles by Rise, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Øygard, L.
Right arrow Articles by Rise, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Education Research, Vol. 11, No. 4, 453-461, 1996
© 1996 Oxford University Press

other

Predicting the intention to eat healthier food among young adults

Lisbet Øygard and Jostein Rise

Research Center for Health Promotion, University of Bergen Øistensgate 3, N-5007 Bergen, Norway

The purpose of this study was to investigate which factors predicted the intention to eat healthier food. The empirical data stem from a questionnaire survey carried out among 527 young adults aged 23–26 years living in Oslo, Norway. The study was carried out in September 1991. The Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) was used as a guiding theoretical framework. The components of the TPB accounted for 32% of the variance in behavioral intention. Attitude was the strongest predictor, followed by perceived behavioral control. Subjective norm received the lowest weight A detailed analysis of the underlying cognitive structures revealed that the outcomes which discriminated most strongly between those who intended to eat healthier food, those who were undecided and those who had no intention, were that healthier food would improve the shape of the body, increase enjoyment of food and reduce weight. In addition, the control beliefs ‘weight’, ‘able to make healthier dishes’, ‘social eating’ and ‘busy’ discriminated mostly between the three intender groups. These outcomes might preferably be addressed in persuasive communications to change intentions to eat healthier food.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Health PsycholHome page
J. R. Masalu and A. N. Astrom
Predicting Intended and Self-perceived Sugar Restriction among Tanzanian Students using the Theory of Planned Behavior
J Health Psychol, July 1, 2001; 6(4): 435 - 445.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.